Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know it has only been 40 years since the Uk adopted the metric system but one might have thought the food industry would have sorted this farce out by now!

Why do I have to buy my coffee in 227g packets Jam in 230g etc. Does my head in!!


The rest of the continent standardises it thus 250, 500 750, 1KG or 330 and 660!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/60940-things-that-get-your-goat/
Share on other sites

Visit a timber yard and try to buy one metre of timber, or two metres, or even four metres.

Standard sizes sold 1.2 metres = just under four feet.

2.4 metres just under eight feet

3.0 metres just under 10 feet

3.6 metres just under 12 feet

4.2 metres just under 14 feet

All are about two to three inches short of the imperial measurement.

In my view not properly metric or imperial.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Before grams what weights were used for cocaine

> ?

> >

> > 0.0352 ounces ??!!

>

> In the 70s? The 'bowlful' was the unit, I believe.


I remember it came in little medicine bottles or vials not in wraps like nowadays and of course it was one helluva lot purer then too but it was bloody expensive. Hence it was called the champagne drug.

If anyone is interested in why we have ended up with such an odd mish-mash of weights and measures, I can recommend Andro Linklater's measuring America. It doesn't make it any less irritating but it's an entertaining read...


http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jul/27/featuresreviews.guardianreview5

Australia had a 'Metric Day' back in the mid-seventies and pretty much everything went metric on that day. In fact, for quite a few years afterwards you couldn't buy tape measures, etc, in imperial, which really annoyed my father. But, even he got used to it and after a while worked out it was actually easier and more accurate to work with something like 5mm rather than 3/16".


Milk was sold in 600ml, rather than the silly 568ml. Everything else went to the nearest rounded amount as well. Sometimes the British show an unusually stubborn determination to be stuck in their ways.


And we still somehow manage to make sponge cakes, WoD! (And we even occasionally cut them into squares, roll them in chocolate and coconut and call them 'Lamingtons'.)

Non-SI measurements are pervasive where you wouldn't expect them, e.g. pressure in psi in all kinds of engineering applications, air speed etc.


But my recent discovery is that according to S.I. my conception of a kilobyte is wrong. The commonly accepted usage is 1024 bytes (a power of two, natch), but S.I. rather weirdly insists even this should be decimal and therefore a 1000, fitting with all other uses of the kilo- prefix. They've even come up with a prefix for the more common usage: "kibi". Needless to say, I'm yet to hear anyone use the newspeak.

450g (well, 453g) IS a pound, so you are cooking it for too long. Most people just use 25 min per 500g plus 25.


Anyway, do what I did and buy one of these - you get perfect roast meat every time. (65C to 70C for chicken)


http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B003ARNMD2?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...