Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hoping someone more experienced with doll-related shopping can help! I have a two year old boy and am about to have a little girl... I like the idea of giving my son a doll so he has a 'baby' to play with, and a few friends who have done this said that their child seemed to enjoy having their own 'baby' to dress up, feed etc. However... having never looked at dolls before I'm overwhelmed! Firstly, they are all pink which is a personal issue of mine :) Secondly, more importantly, I guess, I don't know what to go for...! I can't get my head around all the Baby Annabelles and Baby Borns... I finally decided on the Little Love Baby Talk Interactive doll which does something and seems pretty interesting (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Little-Love-Baby-Talk-Interactive/dp/B00K854AM6/ref=cm_cd_al_qh_dp_t) but turns out the only 'baby' thing she can do is feed, you can't even dress her up...


So ... any suggestions? Has anyone else tried this? Or has any suggestions about dolls... or maybe this is just a waste of money?!!


The baby has already got him a puzzle which he will love, but this is an extra idea...


Thanks!

Baby Annabelles and Baby Borns are expensive for what they are and my 3 girls were 'freaked out' by speaking baby dolls.


We have got a boy baby Annabelle and you can get a boy in this ELC doll, although it has no interactive features:


http://www.elc.co.uk/Cup-Cake-Newborn-Baby-Girl-Doll/136792,default,pd.html


Does your son like dolls? I don't mean that in a sexist way. I have 3 girls; the eldest was never interested in baby dolls and preferred grown up dolls like Barbie (bleurgh). My middle daughter loved them, esp that ELC one as it looks very newborn. My youngest prefers looking after soft toys to dolls. On the whole our dolls spent more time in the toy basket than being played with.


Have you seen the dreaded Build a Bear shops where you can stuff your own bear and get a birth certificate and clothes etc?


Also Fur Real pets went down a storm in our house as something to look after, which I think is what you are trying to embrace.

I wouldn't worry too much about the pink - all our dolls end up naked. I also find bells and whistles are mostly ignored and children just role play with them using purely their imagination, so in your place I would get a Sainsburys one for ?10 or so. They sell lots of accessories so you could get a buggy too for ?5 etc. My daughter also likes carrying her dolls in a sling, which can just be a length of material.


My two year old son is devoted to cars but also likes cuddling his sister's dolls and pushing them in the buggy. He doesn't have the same total love of the dolls that she had at his age though. I promise we did no 'gendering' of toys at all; this is where they have both ended up of their own accord.

I got these for my 2 boys http://m.johnlewis.com/mt/www.johnlewis.com/john-lewis-baby-doll-twins/p1517957?sku=233718490&kpid=233718490&s_kenid=23c9b382-25ed-d789-3ae3-0000278f69cc&s_kwcid=403x12373&tmad=c&tmcampid=73&kpid=233718490#page_loaded

Twin babies. They're pretty basic but only ?15 and went down very well. One pink and one blue so you could maybe let your little boy pick one for him and one for his new sister? Agree with the above though that it doesn't have to be dolls. Ours are a recent development. When number 2 arrived we didn't have them and instead spent lots of time feeding and changing teddy bears.

We got the single version of the john lewis dolls listed above. I got in a bit of a quandary re whether to go for pink or blue though - we were having a girl, but chose the blue as the colour was less offensive (they've changed the clothes now). He liked it for a while but was never so into the doll - his baby sister is now 2 and its 'her baby' and she loves it, so realistically go for a cheap doll and someone will play with it. The idea of getting a buggy to go with it is good though - John Lewis do a cheap and cheerful one too - obviously pink or blue again (what else...)

My son plays with his big sisters dolls. Any and all of them although he seems to prefer the littler ones which are also lighter. I think the one he seems to gravitate to is a small plastic one that came from sainsburys with a bath. She has a white nappy and green Tshirt! I'm not sure he would be that into it if he didn't have a big sister fussy about dolls. However, he LOVES the dolls pushchair and I think any child would. Again, this was a ?5 from sainsburys and drives myself and my husband nuts but the kids love it. It is horribly pink though.

Good luck!

Our new baby boy gave our daughter the Mothercare/ELC Cupcake My Baby Brother and a blue pushchair. As someone else said it's now naked and we call it Dolly so it's become more female. Went down well. It does have batteries and would say "mama" "papa" and laugh when tickled and suck from the bottle when put to it's mouth but we haven't shown her that yet for sanity sake!

Both of my boys have dolls. Eldest took his everywhere (along with a random collection of other cuddly toys) and baby is just starting to play with his now.


They both have boy dolls from Imajo (I think you can buy them on Amazon): http://www.imajo.co.uk/sections/1/anisa_collection/


They're lovely simple rag dolls which you can dress, cuddle in bed, etc.

Thank you EVERYONE! Its so helpful to have such a wide range of responses. Its helpful that others have had the same discussion and debate about this... and great to have so many options to choose from. A huge thankyou for taking the time to respond.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...