Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've spent hours:


followingtwitter updates on swine flu which have lead me to ... freakish analyses by economists on the potential impact of flu pandemic on personal finance


reading the news about swine flu and feel like I'm watching it spread - mexico, new york, heathrow ...


exploring quite why the 1918 pandemic killed mostly the healthy, early middle aged


checking out flu-wiki and reading crazy shopping lists for pandemic social meltdown scenarios (apparently I don't need to worry so much about stockpiling "creamer" as likely as not I'll have plenty in but 106 loo rolls are pretty much essential)


checking out the price of counterfeit tamiflu online


so, just the usual saturday night self-torture then - not looking forward to a day with the sunday papers and more armageddon-lite with my kippers

nah, go for it. after a medical professional (though in an entirely social context) suggested that my headache might actually be a tumour, I googled away and came up with the conclusion that I had mere hours to live. I consider having outlived that by some months to be a massive bonus.


So should you - every day you survive the pig disease is a day snatched from the reaper's scythe - embrace, dance, celebrate, eat bacon

Someone I know had a medical book and whenever they had a twinge a sniffle or a combination of the like they would run to the medical book and convince themselves that they had the most terminal illness known to man. So I spent hours convincing them to ditch the book and stop being silly, In the end they took my advice and recovered from the hysteria of it all.


Ignore the profits of doom no good can come from thinking "Were all gonna die" which is going to happen anyway it's just a question of when.

Mikecg Wrote:

Ignore the profits of doom no good can come from thinking "Were all gonna die" which is going to happen anyway it's just a question of when.


As a Businessman I can't ignore any Profits, even doom-laden ones.


Now Prophets Of Doom, I steer well clear of those jokers...:)


As for "We're all gonna die"....speak for yourself Mikey! I don't intend going anywhere, for one.


The'll have to drag me out kickin' and screamin'......and anyway we've just finished off the garden fencing so it would be MOST inconvenient at this present time...

So is the bacon in my frigde safe?

I was intending to fry six rashers, with three tomatos and put them between the halved slces of some white baps.

Baps I had smeared with Branston's Gherkin Relish and all.

So should I carry on with this gourmet treat or not?

You should be alright mate I recon if you use lard and have the gas quite low so it cooks slowly it should kill any bugs. I could murder a bacon sarni I'm quite jealous, there's no bacon in my house. 6 rashers is quite a lot of fat though however knock yourself out.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You should be alright mate I recon if you use lard

> and have the gas quite low so it cooks slowly it

> should kill any bugs. I could murder a bacon sarni

> I'm quite jealous, there's no bacon in my house. 6

> rashers is quite a lot of fat though however knock

> yourself out.


Thanks Mike, lard and low gas you say? When I receive sound scientific advice of this sort I know I'm in safe hands.

I'm reckonong on preparing it quite a bit later, I'm not working tomorrow and fancy watching the late night showing of Chinatown, so I may well save this gastronomic treat for round about then.

I'll let you know tomorrow how it turns out.

If I survive.

I'm joking of course.

>>So is the bacon in my frigde safe?

>>I was intending to fry six rashers, with three tomatos and put them between the halved slces of some white baps.

>>Baps I had smeared with Branston's Gherkin Relish and all.

>>So should I carry on with this gourmet treat or not?<<


You could always try using bread instead.... B)

If the earth has been in existance for say 24 hours, then man has walked the earth for the equivalent of the last minute.


This being the case - and the fact that having worked at a funeral directors I regularly had to hold my breath when loved ones spent THOUSANDS on a coffin and a big expensive funeral when, if it were me, I'd want to have that money NOW -


let's just live a little!

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>So is the bacon in my frigde safe?

> >>I was intending to fry six rashers, with three

> tomatos and put them between the halved slces of

> some white baps.

> >>Baps I had smeared with Branston's Gherkin

> Relish and all.

> >>So should I carry on with this gourmet treat or

> not?

> You could always try using bread instead.... B)


Thanks for that SimonM, I appreciate being included in this sort of laddish innuendo.

But right now in reality, the odds of the likelihood of me placing bacon, tomatos and Branson's Gherkin Relish between the breasts of a woman are long indeed.

In some part, no doubt due to my being partial to six rashers of bacon, tomatos and Gherkin Relish on two large baps.

And so it goes.

mmm nice


Key Points ?Health impacts of an influenza pandemic in the UK

? All age groups are likely to be affected, but children and otherwise fit adults

could be at relatively greater risk.

? Clinical attack rates may be of the order of 25% to 35%, but up to 50% is

possible.

? Between 55,000 and 750,000 deaths are possible, across the UK.


mmmm and just for London:


3.12 An influenza pandemic (as detailed in WHO Pandemic Flu Phase 6) will result in a

large number of deaths throughout London. The above planning assumptions

predict a range of permutations of case fatality and clinical attack rates in London. It

is possible that the pandemic influenza virus will have a 50% clinical attack rate and

a 2.5% case fatality rate. For London, this means planning for approximately

94,0001 possible excess deaths.

Well you can only die once!


So what's the point of worrying and feeling blue, it's up to you, just spread a little happiness as you go by, don't sigh. even though the darkest clouds are in the sky, you mustn't sigh, and you mustn't cry, spread a little happiness as you go by

a dottle dottle a dottle dottle tiiiiiissssshhhhhhh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...