Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have a skip outside our house which we have paid for. Over the last few days various people,unknown, and one in particular, have decided that they have the right to use this skip without asking us and have half filled it with their rubbish.

It is obvious that this skip is not communal and the majority of decent people around would accept this as fact.

Whoever has had the ghastly blue toilet removed from their house if you are reading this ....... shame on you for taking advantage of others in this way.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6185-skips-people-using-mine-lounged/
Share on other sites

skip companies are able to provide lids for you if you are having problems with this - I know it's too late in this instance but they can give you covers which can be locked down to stop dumping (if your planning to keep it for much longer it may be worth asking if you company offer this). Other than that these people are no better than fly tippers essentially
It's always been a problem. The most effective solution I've found is to save all the rubbish up in an unsightly pile then get the skip when you have a skip-full. Unfortunately it is neither convenient nor pleasant, but there you go. I hope you're thinking up some choice phrases for if you catch someone dumping their stuff in yours..!

bettet to use someone elses skip than dump the shite on a stret corner under cover of darkness


its like owning a car in London - you accept minor bumps & grazes on your wheels as part of the package - ditto smeone using your skip - I have both dumped stuff in other people skips and had my own populated by other people shite - swings and roundabouts

It's the unwritten rule of the suburbs "He who leaves his skip uncovered on the public carriageway shall, as a reward for such selfless, public-spirited generosity, receive everybody's unwanted household junk".


There will always be at least one item of an old bathroom suite. You should consider yourself lucky you didn't get the matching bath and sink too.

I have hired a few skips in my day and never had a problem with anyone "using" them. As Marmora Man says, you are just as likely to have someone grab something and take it away


If had a specific project on and needed every cubed centimetre of space then I would take steps to discourage people - but to say it;'s no better than fly tipping is a bit inaccurate.


Fly tipping = ugly mattress/washing machine on side of road, uninvited spoiling the vibe


People putting stuff in your skip = an already-in-place unattractive unit, probably not full and probably not going to be, which is being used for the temporary storage of unwanted rubbish. Who fills it is not really the point. Yes, the owner is paying for it but what's the harm overall? (with the exception of aforementioned planned projects which NEED every bit of space - in which case, take steps to inform people)

snorky Wrote:

> its like owning a car in London - you accept minor

> bumps & grazes on your wheels as part of the

> package


If someone puts a minor bump or graze on my Jaguar I'll rip their nipples off. Personally I like the package to involve me not hitting anybody else and nobody else hitting me. That's why we have driving tests, surely.

Why should someone who's hired (paying approx ?250+ a fill) a skip expect/allow others to use it? What a load of rubbish (pun intended) Snorky, ???? et al. If you hired a private space in a bar and put a tab of ?250 behind the bar, would you expect people not on your guest list to go and drink from it for free? I think not...


And yes, ibilly99, there are other things going on in the world to be worried about but considering the quantity of different things that people get narked off about on the EDF, I would say this is no less or more important than anything else.


red devil - I like your style.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...