Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hurrah! At last, I can throw off the blue stockings and pass on the mantle (or indeed hosiery) - you go Morag!


But tell me, why do you think there are no longer any real women? We're all around you. And don't be deceived by the tats and fake breasts - I'm convinced that buried within Lucy Pinder's straining bosom is the heaving heart of a young Helene Cixous*.




*well perhaps not, but we're not so bad are we?

Well Dr Proctor, wasn,t it Margeret Thatcher who answered questions with a question! I dont think she was a real woman

she set women back years, let them down. The womens Lib that started to get somewhere in the seventies, came to a full stop under her. She just wooed the women to get voted in then abandoned them,

RosieH,

I'm not allowed out, I only go to buy a pint of Milk but inadvertantly divert my self to the pub knowing I'm in for some beats when I get home, and after the 46 missed calls on my phone it gets a bit much and the dread and fear factor are hardly worth the effort. BTW there is only a finite number of times you can use the Milk trick.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH,

> I'm not allowed out, I only go to buy a pint of

> Milk but inadvertantly divert my self to the pub

> knowing I'm in for some beats when I get home


Ahhhh, and suddenly everything is illuminated...

Nice.


But seriously RosieH


My wife doesnt have to go to work she gets to look after my plasma tv all day and go to coffee mornings with the girls. she's always out and I'm always at work. on the upside she does all my ironing cooking and cleaning which is a job and a half I know, but she gets everything she wants and can do what she likes as long as the main stuff like the kids and housewife stuff gets done. I'm not saying she is a doormat she would smash me in the face with a frying pan even if I tried to even suggest it.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I'm not saying she is a doormat she would smash me in

the face with a frying pan even if I tried to even

suggest it.


On the contrary Mike, I wasn't suggesting for a second that your missus might be a doormat. Rather that the picture you painted of regular beatings and outings only for the purchase of essential groceries might go some way to explain why you seem to have a teeny weeny bit of an issue with the ladies.

Morag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there should be a statue of Emily

> Pankhurst in Trafalgur Square. Women should be

> represented properly in society. We are not all

> chocolate, shoes, and bags,. Lots of us still

> want equal footing with men, and wages.We all dont

> want to be silly cows who just want to be used by

> men and get drunk like them. drinking beer.

> Pathetic.Skinhead children no doubt. "Shall I get

> my nails done" "Shall I get a nose piercing" or

> shall I have another tatoo". Or shall I feed my

> kids;descisions oh dear. where did it all go

> wrong.?


Who lit the fuse on your tampon sweetie?

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mikecg Wrote:

> >

>

>

>

> Oh woofy me old mucka and I thought you were dead!




NO no not yet "ciggers" just been away init...


W**F


*whines quietly.....grrrr*

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mikecg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> I'm not saying she is a doormat she would smash me

> in

> the face with a frying pan even if I tried to

> even

> suggest it.

>

> On the contrary Mike, I wasn't suggesting for a

> second that your missus might be a doormat.

> Rather that the picture you painted of regular

> beatings and outings only for the purchase of

> essential groceries might go some way to explain

> why you seem to have a teeny weeny bit of an issue

> with the ladies.



Please RosieH you must know me by now. I actually know you dont get me at all and your not alone with that one, I really dont have an issue with the Ladies I love them to bits. I am however a bit of a clown yes thats right I've said it now and I like to add fuel to the flames when I should really leave it alone, some things I just cant help but have a bit of a laugh about well take the piss a bit really. I have noticed that you do seem to be a little bit anti mikecg, I like to think I am a modern man with the belief that woman are as much an asset to the world and in some instances more so. Do you really think what I said was true?. It's just a bit of a lad joke really, maybe some of the blokes that read it had a little chuckle. please explain where you think I have a problem with the Ladies? and I'll see if I can set you straight.

Morag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well maybe nasty bankers, Micheal Jackson,and

> other above the law people can. but little ol

> husbands with wild imaginations, should spend more

> time with their.partnersDont you reckon?Mikeg



Has somebody been nasty to you Morag? you seem a little bit upset about something?. Get it off your chest and tell me whats wrong you will feel a lot better when you speak to somebody about it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...