Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitist*. (Louisa's lounged response)


Recommended Posts

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

yet still plenty of buttons are

> pushed as witnessed by the popularity of threads

> such as this.


It's a different sort of button in here though, is it not? More of a pantomime bunfight by a load of people who know each other too well.


For Lou - an altogether less satisfying experience - and all those rich pickings over in the general issues section going begging at the same time.. must be infuriating (ho ho ho)

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The interesting thing (to me, anyway) is that

> Lou's restriction to the lounge has really exposed

> the one-dimensionality of the contributions...


1-D is key when setting-up a character, the less you have to remember, the less likely you are to forget what that character would say/has said.


Lousia, how old is your character supposed to be?...

The irony of all of this, is that good old thick skinned *Bob* still cannot (Or knowingly refuses), to acknowledge that by definition, many (most) of his contributions to this forum are along the same tired old lines, time and time again. A made up character yourself *Bob*? Once again shifting the goal posts and not responding to my questions, so that YOU aren't accused of the very same things you accuse me of doing. Great stuff, no, it really is a good move. It's clearly working too, because no-one else has pulled you up on it either.


Louisa.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> yet still plenty of buttons are

> > pushed as witnessed by the popularity of

> threads

> > such as this.

>

> It's a different sort of button in here though, is

> it not? More of a pantomime bunfight by a load of

> people who know each other too well.


Maybe so...but some posters still engage with the content of what Louisa is saying. It's a reaction. Perhaps not so much on this thread.

Jeremy of course he is. Thank you for at least being the only ONE to admit that! No one else has the guts to.


And *Bob* that is therefore different to me in what sense? None!


.... Yet I get all the blame. Takes two to tango my lovely.


Louisa.

Don't justify it red devil. *Bob* as much a made up character with his constant sarcasm and put down schtick. Let's face it, that is what *Bob* does, he has done it well over the years, despite becoming largely predictable. But you can't claim he is other than that. What other contributions has he made to the forum other than that?


Btw thanks for comparing me to the krankies, always been a fan.


Louisa.

This is seriously funny.


Lou and Fox have been exposed as one trick ponies.


I used the term "troll lite" for a reason. It's not a classic or malicious trolling act - just a one dimensional and stale one.


If only the forum could self regulate by voting people off....I suspect two would have gone by now.

Anyway I can't believe anyone would seriously give enough of a monkeys about being 'banned from General issues section' (like, whoop, big deal) to feel the need to issue 'stop press - my official response to' threads over here.


I mean, really - think about it. its just not dignified.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lou and Fox have been exposed as one trick ponies.


I'm going to stand up for fox here.. certainly don't agree with everything he says, but his posts have never seemed unpleasant or confrontational in any way. Just a guy who doesn't buy into the "zeitgeist" of newly affluent East Dulwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If anyone had half an ounce of intelligence they would vote for the Green Party or a real socialist alternative. I have never, and will never back a bunch of ‘champagne socialists’ who have not done a single positive thing for work class people.    Louisa. 
    • That the leaders of our country are wealthy people comes as a shock to you? How ridiculous.  Why shouldn’t they be living in those houses?  
    • No such thing as a “witch hunt” against a taxpayer funded public figure. Especially someone in charge of finances.    It is the responsibility of a landlord to ensure the agent acting on their behalf has done everything required to validate a tenancy. And to double check that too. Stop justifying it as some sort of ‘oversight’ purely down to the agent.    Also, I’d question the socialist credentials of a Labour chancellor owning a beautiful detached house on a private estate close to the edge of Dulwich Village. Great Brownings, according to some media outlets. What a s**tshow.    Louisa.    https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/dulwich/southwark-faces-calls-to-take-action-against-chancellor-rachel-reeves-who-is-accused-of-breaking-housing-rules-when-renting-out-dulwich-home/
    • Was the property in one the wards Southwark added last November? It would be a bit harsh if it was and Southwark didn’t notify residents and landlords. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...