Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitist*. (Louisa's lounged response)


Recommended Posts

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

yet still plenty of buttons are

> pushed as witnessed by the popularity of threads

> such as this.


It's a different sort of button in here though, is it not? More of a pantomime bunfight by a load of people who know each other too well.


For Lou - an altogether less satisfying experience - and all those rich pickings over in the general issues section going begging at the same time.. must be infuriating (ho ho ho)

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The interesting thing (to me, anyway) is that

> Lou's restriction to the lounge has really exposed

> the one-dimensionality of the contributions...


1-D is key when setting-up a character, the less you have to remember, the less likely you are to forget what that character would say/has said.


Lousia, how old is your character supposed to be?...

The irony of all of this, is that good old thick skinned *Bob* still cannot (Or knowingly refuses), to acknowledge that by definition, many (most) of his contributions to this forum are along the same tired old lines, time and time again. A made up character yourself *Bob*? Once again shifting the goal posts and not responding to my questions, so that YOU aren't accused of the very same things you accuse me of doing. Great stuff, no, it really is a good move. It's clearly working too, because no-one else has pulled you up on it either.


Louisa.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> yet still plenty of buttons are

> > pushed as witnessed by the popularity of

> threads

> > such as this.

>

> It's a different sort of button in here though, is

> it not? More of a pantomime bunfight by a load of

> people who know each other too well.


Maybe so...but some posters still engage with the content of what Louisa is saying. It's a reaction. Perhaps not so much on this thread.

Jeremy of course he is. Thank you for at least being the only ONE to admit that! No one else has the guts to.


And *Bob* that is therefore different to me in what sense? None!


.... Yet I get all the blame. Takes two to tango my lovely.


Louisa.

Don't justify it red devil. *Bob* as much a made up character with his constant sarcasm and put down schtick. Let's face it, that is what *Bob* does, he has done it well over the years, despite becoming largely predictable. But you can't claim he is other than that. What other contributions has he made to the forum other than that?


Btw thanks for comparing me to the krankies, always been a fan.


Louisa.

This is seriously funny.


Lou and Fox have been exposed as one trick ponies.


I used the term "troll lite" for a reason. It's not a classic or malicious trolling act - just a one dimensional and stale one.


If only the forum could self regulate by voting people off....I suspect two would have gone by now.

Anyway I can't believe anyone would seriously give enough of a monkeys about being 'banned from General issues section' (like, whoop, big deal) to feel the need to issue 'stop press - my official response to' threads over here.


I mean, really - think about it. its just not dignified.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lou and Fox have been exposed as one trick ponies.


I'm going to stand up for fox here.. certainly don't agree with everything he says, but his posts have never seemed unpleasant or confrontational in any way. Just a guy who doesn't buy into the "zeitgeist" of newly affluent East Dulwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That’s interesting, Dulwich Dweller; my 70 yr old neighbour told me 2 weeks ago that he’d left work early to go and book in person (being uncomfortable with all the online & app stuff) and was explicitly told that he needed to go away and book online. He’s not the sort of person to be insistent and, like a lot of older people, a bit embarrassed at his lack of digital ability, so he left without the appointment . This is my point about inconsistency, since his experience was quite different from yours. I’m beginning think that it rather depends on who, at Reception, you speak to on day…
    • Wow, never had a disappointing meal there since they opened.. guess like every establishment, depends on the chef.. All for allowing an off day - good of you to post.. much better than chains - had awful service at Gail’s for eg..be it cake and tea or a meal.. They are so nice and accommodating..       
    • "I tried Viet Flavour and was disappointed.  Their summer rolls especially were not at all good, stodgy and flavourless.  Pho-OK.  I'm hoping it will get better " Back in June I posted as above.  I am glad to report that either the first time I went the restaurant was having an off day, or they have upped their game.  I ordered the same things.  The summer roll was exactly as it should be, and had a lovely dipping sauce. The Pho was delicious.  My brother who was with me wanted to give it 10/10 but I always think you should leave room for improvement so gave it 9/10.  Staff were lovely.  I am so glad because I love Vietnamese food and now think I have a very good one just round the corner.  
    • So do I, and I started it!!!  I have changed title.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...