Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another look which is very wrong... the early

> 2000's phenomenon of a suit jacket with jeans.

> Popular in bars throughout Essex a few years ago,

> and can still be witnessed along Lordship Lane on

> occasion.


This is alive and well in Richmond.

What Anna and Sean said. I'm all for walking to the office in comfortable shoes before changing into heels for the day (and to my boss's bemusement have a stack of shoe boxes in his cupboard) but I've bought black ballet pumps for the purpose.


White trainers over fine black tights are particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the sweat being generated between the two is a bit nauseating...

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> White trainers over fine black tights are

> particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the

> sweat being generated between the two is a bit

> nauseating...



Well this is because people are missing the crucial knee-high white socks pushed down around their ankles Kids from Fame style. I have more of an issue with the fine black tights - for that there is no excuse.

Annasfield you are now officially the new forum fashion police. I agree with you over the whole suit and trainers but can I ask your opinion on my 'look'. I wear these with suit trousers. Wadya think sweetheart?


http://www.safetysupplies.co.uk/trolleyed/images/products/jal.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...