Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another look which is very wrong... the early

> 2000's phenomenon of a suit jacket with jeans.

> Popular in bars throughout Essex a few years ago,

> and can still be witnessed along Lordship Lane on

> occasion.


This is alive and well in Richmond.

What Anna and Sean said. I'm all for walking to the office in comfortable shoes before changing into heels for the day (and to my boss's bemusement have a stack of shoe boxes in his cupboard) but I've bought black ballet pumps for the purpose.


White trainers over fine black tights are particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the sweat being generated between the two is a bit nauseating...

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> White trainers over fine black tights are

> particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the

> sweat being generated between the two is a bit

> nauseating...



Well this is because people are missing the crucial knee-high white socks pushed down around their ankles Kids from Fame style. I have more of an issue with the fine black tights - for that there is no excuse.

Annasfield you are now officially the new forum fashion police. I agree with you over the whole suit and trainers but can I ask your opinion on my 'look'. I wear these with suit trousers. Wadya think sweetheart?


http://www.safetysupplies.co.uk/trolleyed/images/products/jal.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...