Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another look which is very wrong... the early

> 2000's phenomenon of a suit jacket with jeans.

> Popular in bars throughout Essex a few years ago,

> and can still be witnessed along Lordship Lane on

> occasion.


This is alive and well in Richmond.

What Anna and Sean said. I'm all for walking to the office in comfortable shoes before changing into heels for the day (and to my boss's bemusement have a stack of shoe boxes in his cupboard) but I've bought black ballet pumps for the purpose.


White trainers over fine black tights are particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the sweat being generated between the two is a bit nauseating...

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> White trainers over fine black tights are

> particularly weird-looking, and the thought of the

> sweat being generated between the two is a bit

> nauseating...



Well this is because people are missing the crucial knee-high white socks pushed down around their ankles Kids from Fame style. I have more of an issue with the fine black tights - for that there is no excuse.

Annasfield you are now officially the new forum fashion police. I agree with you over the whole suit and trainers but can I ask your opinion on my 'look'. I wear these with suit trousers. Wadya think sweetheart?


http://www.safetysupplies.co.uk/trolleyed/images/products/jal.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...