Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Then you're not entering the style stakes at all,

> and you are FREE, free as a bird!

>

> But doesn't mean we can't talk about it.


And of course talk about Brendan, I mean what does he look like?

With his skate plimsoles and his not giving a toss.

God help us if there's a war, that's all I can say.

I actually turned up to court once realising I had forgotten to bring my shoes. I changed from my motorcycle gear into my suit and walked into court with the bike boots on. The People Who Mattered did not see below my waist to notice, and everyone else just dared not say anything.


I don't have a problem with black trainers and suits. They can look nice. White trainers and suits still smacks of Chav though.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> because for some of us the memory of being an

> altar boy and having to wear black pumps - rubber

> dollies as we used to call them for some reason -

> is still too raw


Sean - any pictures of you as an altar boy in your black dollies?!

I've been busted it seems, although the reason is below.


I've started running home from work and to ensure I'm not carrying more than a light bag I leave my shoes at work. This leaves me shoeless of a morning so on the trainers go until I arrive at work.


In case you were wondering, no I don't change my socks :D

The suit / gym trainers combo is morning choice at ED station and is so bad it's clearly for commuting comfort only. I'd love to wear my Nike Air Max for the schlep in but can't bring myself to do it after spending a good sum on a suit that fits.


I will however, dispense with the tie until I'm in...give it 20 years I predict ties will go the way of bowler hats. A good, quality, open necked shirt with a stiff collar is less formal but can look great with a suit.


Jacket and jeans? I still BELIEVE and wear this on occasion but the key is not to just wear your work suit jacket - should be a blazer /tailored / casula style (strictly no brass buttons) and again teamed with a decent shirt, no rips in the jeans and some smart brown/black shoes.


Get it wrong and you look like a Fulhamite or my old Geography teacher, Mr Cuthil.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> should be a blazer /tailored /

> casula style (strictly no brass buttons) and again

> teamed with a decent shirt, no rips in the jeans

> and some smart brown/black shoes.


Is "casula" a typo, or some sort of preppy fashion keyword?

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annasfield you are now officially the new forum

> fashion police. I agree with you over the whole

> suit and trainers but can I ask your opinion on my

> 'look'. I wear these with suit trousers. Wadya

> think sweetheart?

>

> http://www.safetysupplies.co.uk/trolleyed/images/p

> roducts/jal.jpg


bigbadwolf - from my mental image of you, you'd look good in anything.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bigbadwolf Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Annasfield you are now officially the new forum

> > fashion police. I agree with you over the whole

> > suit and trainers but can I ask your opinion on

> my

> > 'look'. I wear these with suit trousers. Wadya

> > think sweetheart?

> >

> >

> http://www.safetysupplies.co.uk/trolleyed/images/p

>

> > roducts/jal.jpg

>

> bigbadwolf - from my mental image of you, you'd

> look good in anything.


Even a black shawl-collared dinner jacket, black shirt, pink trousers and black pointed Robot brothel creepers, Anna?

I thought it was only me circa 1979 that looked good in that.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Jacket and jeans? I still BELIEVE and wear this on

> occasion but the key is not to just wear your work

> suit jacket - should be a blazer /tailored /

> casula style (strictly no brass buttons) and again

> teamed with a decent shirt, no rips in the jeans

> and some smart brown/black shoes.


I have to confess I quite like this look. Suits with Nike type trainers... no way.


If a guy really wants to do suit with trainers, do darker coloured skate type ones or converse type ones ala David Tennant in Doctor Who, but white with dark suits looks so naff and nike trainers are for sports wear only, look crap with jeans too.


I can sympathize with people wanting a comfortsble option, but I couldn't do gym trainers with a skirt. I do ballet pumps instead of heels a lot of the time - keep some heels at work. I have been known to wear converse trainers with linen trousers too but think they can look ok if its the right colour.

ms_1316 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been busted it seems, although the reason is

> below.

>

> I've started running home from work and to ensure

> I'm not carrying more than a light bag I leave my

> shoes at work. This leaves me shoeless of a

> morning so on the trainers go until I arrive at

> work.

>

> In case you were wondering, no I don't change my

> socks :D



But does this mean you screw your suit up in your "light bag"??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...