Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sooooooooo, my deduction's....BBW's being a

> 'natural detective' means looking at EDF drink

> photos and doing a bit of stalking on

> Facebook....elemementary my dear Wolf


You missed out the electoral roll and criminal records bureau. Remember Quids, I've shook hands with the skeletons in YOUR closet!

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I assume if you gals recognised BBW then thats

> because he has been to an EDF drinks rathar then

> looking more wolflike than the other punters...


I've never attended a forum drinks.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I almost can't think of anywhere you'd be least

> likely to be in physical danger than an EDF

> drinks

>

> ...other than liver damage


I agree with ???? - but to answer your question, since I know you know what I look like then I'd be happy to say hello in person.


Moos - speaking whenever she likes since the good old days.

I think I made a mistake regarding your appearance Moos so no, I don't know what you look like. I'll be walking down lordship lane shortly and I'll be wearing a cream t-shirt and blue denims so if you want to come up and say hello feel free. I wont be putting up with any 'funny stuff' from those I may or may not have offended in the past.
I met Mikecg today in the EDT. He was of course utterly star struck through shock and awe but he's quite a nice man. Alot bigger than I imagined as well so I may be forced to think twice before picking on his spelling mistakes, ........actually I probably wont.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
    • Isabelle Capitain on 7 Upland Road will be able to do that for you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...