Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'll be flying from City airport next month and wonder how much traffic I should expect going there early on a weekday morning (travelling alone with a baby and a suitcase so avoiding bus/train/DLR etc... will take a cab). At what time should I leave if I need to be there at 8am?

reetpetite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you are going by cab they would be able to tell

> you .


They often add lots of time to the estimate to make sure you're there on time. I obviously want to be careful but was wondering what's realistic...

I would budget more than 45 minutes myself. I drive from ED to East India Dock (on the A13 about 2 miles shy of the airport) every morning. I leave home at 7.20 and get to work at 0800. That's on an average day with no problems.


On Thursday last week the same journey took an hour and a half because someone had broken down in the tunnel.


I'd budget some extra time for heavy traffic.


PS Which way do people who think it can be done in 45 minutes go? I'd thought I'd found the quickest routes after 6 years of trying!

I often get cabs to City airport but for early flights like 7.30 since you have to get there early I'm often in a cab by 0545-0600 and it takes 25-30 mins that time of day.

Later though the masses are up and about and you need to allow a lot of time.

Beware the cab firms that charge 'waiting costs' for collection at City airport because of the 'holding area' for waiting cars where supposedly they pay to wait somewhere for you to arrive.

I'd get there early - the restaurant area of the waiting lounge has high chairs and is generally relatively baby friendly. We've done an early flight from City a few times with baby in tow, and getting there in time to stuff breakfast in him worked quite well.

Only me! Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Arrive at Jamaica Rd/Rotherhithe Tunnel from

> Southwark Pk Rd, rather than from Surrey

> Quays/Lower Rd.


The problem with going via Jamaica Rd is that at some point you have to do a right turn onto it, which can be a real pain. I often go around the top of Rotherhithe. It's longer but there's never on ounce of traffic and you whizz right into the tunnel. Keep that nice and quiet though - it's a secret :)


I'm still dubious about being able to get to the airport for 8 am in 45 minutes!

Thanks for all the replies. Circumstances changed and I will now fly at 1pm so I won't need to worry about morning traffic. Think I'll leave home 2 hours before the flight, allowing 1 hour to get there (too much) and 1 hour to get through security with a baby (too much as well). Stress free and not a ridiculous amount of waiting hopefully.


Thanks for the tip about the route, will ask the cab driver what (s)he thinks...

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes but you have to get to Lewisham first and the #185 can take ages especially in lunchtime traffic. I have never understood why it so difficult to get to City Airport or Docklands from East Dulwich or Forest Hill, both of them should be put on the East London Line so that you can change at New Cross Gate.


In fact if I had my way, and BoJo's guarantee of action, I would put all the mainline railway stations and City and Heathrow Airports on the Circle line so that you could travel to any of them without having to change lines as you do at the moment. If we have to have Crossrail it should come into Marylebone not Paddington, which already has umpteen Tube lines, so that people travelling in from the High Wycombe etc part of Buckinghamshire don't have to change twice just to get to Central London.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...