Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Before we can answer that, what kind of Home

> Secretary do we deserve?


Well as a nation we don't on the whole seem much concerned with civil liberties, and we seem to have had a procession of home secretaries who eroded liberties, locked up an increasing number of people (with little rehabilitation), and pushed through an extraordinary number of laws that perhaps suggest institutional paranoia.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208568
Share on other sites

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Before we can answer that, what kind of Home

> > Secretary do we deserve?

>

> Well as a nation we don't on the whole seem much

> concerned with civil liberties, and we seem to

> have had a procession of home secretaries who

> eroded liberties, locked up an increasing number

> of people (with little rehabilitation), and pushed

> through an extraordinary number of laws that

> perhaps suggest institutional paranoia.


Sadly, a vox pop of the public would suggest the majority of them want these restrictiosn to feel "safer"


then again, tha vast majority of the public want to see hanging restored & paedphiles tortured to death with pliers.


I dont care about JS, she is probabaly at nthe better end ofthe shitbag politico spectrum, but its tortology innit


We have moved from an era of steadfast unbending party ethos to the middle ground of bland E-Z listening MOR parties, each willing to sell its greasy worthless soul for a few votes.


I had no love for the Ole Skool Labour Vs Conservative bedrock of the 20th century, but at least you knew how to differentiate between them on a facile basis. You knew where you stood with both these shitbag parties.


Now there is more choice of essentially the same product


200 different flavours of a vanilla ice cream isnt much a choice at all.The media experts and marketeers have commodified politics and made it another product to be sold and consumed.


You vote for these scummers, you rage at the laughable expense claims as directed by the media, you think that placing your little mark on a bit of paper every now and then will make a difference


it doesnt & it wont

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208630
Share on other sites

blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Now there is more choice of essentially the same

> product

>

> 200 different flavours of a vanilla ice cream isnt

> much a choice at all.The media experts and

> marketeers have commodified politics and made it

> another product to be sold and consumed.

>


Very much like Sainbury's versus Tesco.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208659
Share on other sites

I'd vote for a party that abolished first past the post in favour of some form of proportional representation, and that introduced a bill of rights. Unfortunately any party with any chance of winning under the present system is unlikely to implement the former (once they get into office).
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208660
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...