Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Before we can answer that, what kind of Home

> Secretary do we deserve?


Well as a nation we don't on the whole seem much concerned with civil liberties, and we seem to have had a procession of home secretaries who eroded liberties, locked up an increasing number of people (with little rehabilitation), and pushed through an extraordinary number of laws that perhaps suggest institutional paranoia.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208568
Share on other sites

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Before we can answer that, what kind of Home

> > Secretary do we deserve?

>

> Well as a nation we don't on the whole seem much

> concerned with civil liberties, and we seem to

> have had a procession of home secretaries who

> eroded liberties, locked up an increasing number

> of people (with little rehabilitation), and pushed

> through an extraordinary number of laws that

> perhaps suggest institutional paranoia.


Sadly, a vox pop of the public would suggest the majority of them want these restrictiosn to feel "safer"


then again, tha vast majority of the public want to see hanging restored & paedphiles tortured to death with pliers.


I dont care about JS, she is probabaly at nthe better end ofthe shitbag politico spectrum, but its tortology innit


We have moved from an era of steadfast unbending party ethos to the middle ground of bland E-Z listening MOR parties, each willing to sell its greasy worthless soul for a few votes.


I had no love for the Ole Skool Labour Vs Conservative bedrock of the 20th century, but at least you knew how to differentiate between them on a facile basis. You knew where you stood with both these shitbag parties.


Now there is more choice of essentially the same product


200 different flavours of a vanilla ice cream isnt much a choice at all.The media experts and marketeers have commodified politics and made it another product to be sold and consumed.


You vote for these scummers, you rage at the laughable expense claims as directed by the media, you think that placing your little mark on a bit of paper every now and then will make a difference


it doesnt & it wont

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208630
Share on other sites

blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Now there is more choice of essentially the same

> product

>

> 200 different flavours of a vanilla ice cream isnt

> much a choice at all.The media experts and

> marketeers have commodified politics and made it

> another product to be sold and consumed.

>


Very much like Sainbury's versus Tesco.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208659
Share on other sites

I'd vote for a party that abolished first past the post in favour of some form of proportional representation, and that introduced a bill of rights. Unfortunately any party with any chance of winning under the present system is unlikely to implement the former (once they get into office).
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6508-jacqui/#findComment-208660
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...