Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is really interesting!


JoJo09 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gimme Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > One thing for sure is that spending a bit more

> on

> > a bottle is likely to lead to less hangover.

> > Drunk an entire bottle of Alsace Riesling last

> > night (probably about 9 or 10 quid a bottle)

> and

> > no trace of a hangover.

> > Better wine generally contains less chemicals,

> > therefore generally, less hangover...

> > God knows what they put in the ?3 bottles of

> > Aussie red!

> > Bit like the difference between turkey

> twizzlers

> > and a bit of organic turkey really.

>

>

> I'll second that! Got caught up in

> recession-fuelled frugalness after being made

> redundant and decided to purchase a bottle of

> Pinot from Threshers as it was considerably less

> than what i normally spend. I then spent the

> whole of the next day confined to my bed apart

> from a few trips to hug the cistern - took me

> right back to my teenage days! It's definately

> worth getting a quality bottle over saving a few

> quid.

Au contraire... Just been in Alsace on holiday and having just checked my small collection of rieslings, they are all 13%. Although you are right, an Aussie red would probably be slightly stronger.

Anyway, cheap wine will give you more of a hangover. I've got a friend who swears that chardonnay gives her a hangover every time but miraculously Chablis seems to be okay...

The Rieslings I brought home vary from 8% to 12.5% - the 8% is a lovely bottle to drink at lunchtime. Some Aussie reds are 15% and I've sampled one at 16%. It was not as strong to taste as you would think but I am sure that it would give a hangover.


The Alsace is great isn't it? We end up bringing enough wine home to avoid the local off-licenses for several weeks - and the Mosel is even better value.

sorry :-$ just making conversation.


HellNoHellYeah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is really interesting!

>

> JoJo09 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Gimme Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > One thing for sure is that spending a bit

> more

> > on

> > > a bottle is likely to lead to less hangover.

> > > Drunk an entire bottle of Alsace Riesling

> last

> > > night (probably about 9 or 10 quid a bottle)

> > and

> > > no trace of a hangover.

> > > Better wine generally contains less

> chemicals,

> > > therefore generally, less hangover...

> > > God knows what they put in the ?3 bottles of

> > > Aussie red!

> > > Bit like the difference between turkey

> > twizzlers

> > > and a bit of organic turkey really.

> >

> >

> > I'll second that! Got caught up in

> > recession-fuelled frugalness after being made

> > redundant and decided to purchase a bottle of

> > Pinot from Threshers as it was considerably

> less

> > than what i normally spend. I then spent the

> > whole of the next day confined to my bed apart

> > from a few trips to hug the cistern - took me

> > right back to my teenage days! It's definately

> > worth getting a quality bottle over saving a

> few

> > quid.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...