Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 changes for Saturday. Only big surprise for me is they've dropped Monye - who looked comfortable in the First Test making inroads.. not sure Fitzgerald has the physique to do that even if he does carry ball on correct side. Would like to have seen Martyn Williams selected so that the pack weren't so stiff. Other surprise is they've opted for O'Gara instead of Hook on bench.


Backs: R Kearney (Ireland); T Bowe (Ireland), B O'Driscoll (Ireland), J Roberts (Wales), L Fitzgerald (Ireland); S Jones (Wales), M Phillips (Wales);


Fowards: G Jenkins (Wales), M Rees (Wales), A Jones (Wales), S Shaw (England), P O'Connell (Ireland, capt), T Croft (England), D Wallace (Ireland), J Heaslip (Ireland).


Bench: R Ford (Scotland), A Sheridan (England), A-W Jones (Wales), M Williams (Wales), H Ellis (England), R O'Gara (Ireland), S Williams (Wales).

It looks a stromg team to me. I would agree with the Welsh front row. Monye missed 2 great try chances and you have got to take those.


Hopefully Mike Philips service will speed up. Ellis might not have been far away from a call up.


Its a great achievement for Kearney to come to the fore so quickly in the last year or two - don't know if he has replaced Byrne or if Byrne is injured but Kearney really made a positive difference when he came on last time.


Hope this can get this one to set up the decider.

disappointed not to see Ellis start. Pack picked to plug a fairly obvious hole: Shaw in presumably to match the physical challenge in the first half, trade for a younger, faster, lighter model in the 2nd. Painful to admit that the all welsh front row are our best option, but they are. If we can stabilise the set piece it could be a hell of a game - if that falls apart again then i'd say we're buggered...

I don't understand the reason for Harry Ellis the guy would be blown away if he was picked - it's not as if he ripped up any trees during the tour. I thought Mike Phillips had a terrific game once the pack was reinforced with Welsh muscle.


I still think the Springboks will have the upper hand upfront for the 2nd Test. I think the late dominance of the Lions pack last week was somewhat influenced by the Boks withdrawing a number of their top forwards. I also think their Backs will have a point to prove this week. I reckon the Lions players will need to up their game to a brand new level to have any chance of winning.

what mick mac said, essentially. a physically bolstered pack would cover a less hefty scrum half, and for almost the entire second half last week phillips was pedestrian at best. even with the big boys being called in up front, there's obviously a huge amount of pressure in the pack as well as very quickly organising bok defence: quick service is a must.
think the brilliance and unpredictability of roberts and o driscoll meant the lions did not seem to suffer too much from the slow service. They often turned poor service to their advantage. Im really hoping for it all to work out well on saturday. Anyone else think the lions will win on saturday and set up a grand finale?

Phillips keeps the Bok back row honest, Jones goes flat, very flat and that makes space for our top two centres.


The statistics last week showed a large LIONS dominance in attack, breaks etc. But the scrummaging collapse caused a disaster - the penalty count was unplayable in the first half.


I think the Lions may do it ..... with some clever subs in the 2nd half.

brilliant stuff. 8-16 in lions favour at half time. Boks are on the back foot but still v dangerous of course. Adam jones and shaw have made a big difference and the scrums are a worry for the boks. If lions can reproduce the same intensity in the second half they can win this.
great game and v disappointed. Lots of key points in the game and decisions could that could have gone either way. Those things happen in most games but the principal reason the lions lost was that they suffered from injuries to both props and both centres and you cant hold out against the world champs with a second string. But they very nearly did. Thats what sport is all about. Some great performances from the lions.

It was a great game to watch and the Lions gave a good account of themselves, hopefully they can go into the final test and give another top performance. It will still be a huge achievement if the Lions can claim one win against the World Champions.


In the end I think the Lions paid the price for not having Monye and Hook in the 22 man squad. There were a few tackles made on Shane Williams and Fitzgerald that emphasised the loss of not having Monye on the wing. As the injuries came the Lions also paid the penalty for not having Hook as a replacement.


MOTM: Stephen Jones

I don't understand your point about Monye? What would he have brought to the game? Fitzgerald didn't do anything wrong and held on to the ball when needed. Shane Williams only came on because both centres went off injured. Hook would have been better than O'Gara as an option. MOTM either Shaw or Kearney. I reckon we will be stuffed in the final test given the likely large number of changes required.
In the 1st Test Monye glided through the Bok defence and made hard yardage. There is no reason why he should not be able to repeat that feat. Yes he might not know how to carry the ball, but I'd have thought that is something that can be rectified easier than the need to beef up Fitzgerald to make an impact. Shane Williams from 12 months ago would have been a different story but sadly unless these small guys are on top form they are being easily contained by brute force. From watching the first 2 Tests the Lions seemed to make most inroads by power rather than jinking runs and that is why I think the strength of Monye would have been better for the 2nd Test. I think the trickery of the Six Nations is fine up against Italy, Scotland, England - but against the All Blacks or South Africa it needs injecting with a lot more muscle.
i am with declan on this matt. Monye was not missed. Jones played well but not as well as shaw and kearney. I dont think they have to win the final test to prove anything as they could have won this one and the boks know they were fortunate to win. It will end up 3-0 as the lions gave everything in the first 2 tests and are now injury ravaged. But the boks stole this one. The lions gave a good account of themselves on this tour and could have come out of it better.

The only thing about the third test that will please me is that several other guys who haven't had a chance, will now. It doesn't mean I don't think the best team wasn't picked but I'd like to see the likes of D'arcy and Flutey given a go and even the Bull Hayes. Bull v Beast.......could be wrestling. Where's the local SA with the Irish name when you want another opinion?


PS Please let O'Gara redeem himself.He must feel like he lost it but I thought that the pen conceded just before half time could come back to haunt us. It did.


Edited for spelling

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Fitzgerald is 6'1"..........if that's small

> I'm a Dutchman! He is 1" smaller than Monye and

> 7lbs lighter. In the two tests the Lions scored 4

> tries. Which one of them had to do with power and

> not jinking runs?


Haha, I thought he was about 5'6" - I blame it on watching it down the EDT! ;-) Which incidently was an excellent atmosphere if not better than First Test. Definately going back down there for Third Test if anyone else interested let us know.

o,gara,s a dickhead, as was shown in his antics when the ireland team had a royal reception in belfast last month. he was an absolute disgrace, and personally if i was in charge of irish rugby, he wouldn,t play for the country again. and before there,s any comparisons with johnson and mary robinson, what o,gara did dosent even come into the same league.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We’ve got a gap on the roof of our shed that needs patching  don’t want to buy a huge roll so hoping someone has some leftover  happy to collect/reimburse 
    • I never said I thought it was targeted or deliberate. There also has never been a “stand off” or confrontation, we’ve spoken to them in a friendly manner about it. Our experience is they don’t seem to care. That’s the frustrating thing for us, if someone politely raises a concern at least take a second to reflect. Treat others how you would want to be treated.  I don’t want them to lose their job, far from it. But considering it could cost me a days work to fix any damage, I’m within my right to try prevent it.   
    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...