Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We're getting abit of common ground here you will

> notice. Both senior members of these

> aforementioned cults/religions are very aggressive

> people who will not allow anyone to gainsay them.

> What does this tell you? (I dont know, I'm asking

> you!)


Perhaps because their power is totally based on the blind trust and following of the "flock / cult members". These people prey on the vulnerable, weak, needy... Someone with their own mind is not going to follow, so they don't want them anywhere near their inner circle, especially not with a TV Camera!


Just my opinion of course :-$

So going back to the original question "Are there any scientologists in our midst?" Are there any out there that would like to give us their view of last night's programme? I would be interested to know if they feel embarrassed by last night's programme and whether it was a true representation of Scientology's attitude towards people who question them.
yeah, just thought it would be good to get a balanced opinion. The Scientologists have set up website after last night http://www.bbcpanorama-exposed.org/, where you can request a their DVD about the programme. I've ordered one, perhaps we could show it at a Dulwich Paradiso film evening...

I was going to post a balancing point about Scientologies tactics being bullying, but unlike a certain organisation whose name rhymes with Bowman Patholic, they haven't actually been responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people who disagreed with their orthodoxy, but thought it might be too inflammatory.


Doh!!....

Way back when, someone living in a shared house I lived in got involved in one of these cults (don't think it was S********gy). She disappeared, then came back one day 'accompanied' by several not very friendly people to collect her belongings. They pretty much ensured there was no communication. Pretty scary stuff.

Bless you TT, on taking another look at the sketch I think that young lady could be DM.


Anyway just for you TT,as it is your thread and all, here's a scientologist (Top Gun himself) in the mist.


http://www.villainouscompany.com/vcblog/home/cassandr/public_html/vcblog/mt/images/atkinson.jpg

It's going to have to be cushions and the comfy chair.


Remember, said Scient0logy git's head is to be jammed in a window whilst all this larking about is going on, no need to rush.


As and ex-alter boy I want the biggest cruxifix! But happy for Senor Mockers to lead - and get followed about for weeks after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...