Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We're getting abit of common ground here you will

> notice. Both senior members of these

> aforementioned cults/religions are very aggressive

> people who will not allow anyone to gainsay them.

> What does this tell you? (I dont know, I'm asking

> you!)


Perhaps because their power is totally based on the blind trust and following of the "flock / cult members". These people prey on the vulnerable, weak, needy... Someone with their own mind is not going to follow, so they don't want them anywhere near their inner circle, especially not with a TV Camera!


Just my opinion of course :-$

So going back to the original question "Are there any scientologists in our midst?" Are there any out there that would like to give us their view of last night's programme? I would be interested to know if they feel embarrassed by last night's programme and whether it was a true representation of Scientology's attitude towards people who question them.
yeah, just thought it would be good to get a balanced opinion. The Scientologists have set up website after last night http://www.bbcpanorama-exposed.org/, where you can request a their DVD about the programme. I've ordered one, perhaps we could show it at a Dulwich Paradiso film evening...

I was going to post a balancing point about Scientologies tactics being bullying, but unlike a certain organisation whose name rhymes with Bowman Patholic, they haven't actually been responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people who disagreed with their orthodoxy, but thought it might be too inflammatory.


Doh!!....

Way back when, someone living in a shared house I lived in got involved in one of these cults (don't think it was S********gy). She disappeared, then came back one day 'accompanied' by several not very friendly people to collect her belongings. They pretty much ensured there was no communication. Pretty scary stuff.

Bless you TT, on taking another look at the sketch I think that young lady could be DM.


Anyway just for you TT,as it is your thread and all, here's a scientologist (Top Gun himself) in the mist.


http://www.villainouscompany.com/vcblog/home/cassandr/public_html/vcblog/mt/images/atkinson.jpg

It's going to have to be cushions and the comfy chair.


Remember, said Scient0logy git's head is to be jammed in a window whilst all this larking about is going on, no need to rush.


As and ex-alter boy I want the biggest cruxifix! But happy for Senor Mockers to lead - and get followed about for weeks after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...