Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It now looks very close to completion.


Bit like Sagrada Fam?lia in Barcelona..


Construction of Sagrada Fam?lia had commenced in 1882 and Gaud? became involved in 1883

An anticipated completion date of 2026 (144 - years)


330px-Sagrada_Familia_01.jpg


Bit of a difference to a few kerb-stones though..


Foxy

To be fair, this junction was originally flagged during an extensive Living Streets community walkabout back in 2006, but it's taken so long for the East Dulwich cllrs to pursue the elusive funding that it looks like the original concept got toned down by the Tooley Street Dictatorship.


The original idea was to build an extended raised crossing with a view towards creating a "piazza" outside the pub in tandem with the street market, while acting as a traffic calming measure when the road was open.


It's now more of a standard-issue build out with a normal raised crossing, but it's not looking too bad from what I can see emerging. Hopefully we'll be able to install some nice street containers with planting to soften it a bit, but I'm guessing that this will be against some new highways policy...

rch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, this junction was originally flagged

> during an extensive Living Streets community

> walkabout back in 2006, but it's taken so long for

> the East Dulwich cllrs to pursue the elusive

> funding that it looks like the original concept

> got toned down by the Tooley Street Dictatorship.

>

>

> The original idea was to build an extended raised

> crossing with a view towards creating a "piazza"

> outside the pub in tandem with the street market,

> while acting as a traffic calming measure when the

> road was open.

>

> It's now more of a standard-issue build out with a

> normal raised crossing, but it's not looking too

> bad from what

I can see emerging. Hopefully we'll

be able to install some nice street containers> with planting to soften it a bit, but I'm guessing> that this will be against some new highway> policy...


Please bear in mind planters may well impede view of oncoming traffic / cyclists from motorists turning out of North Cross Rd.

There are other examples of this where railings impede the view of oncoming traffic.


Ok from vans but when in a car you are much lower down so as a driver you have to edge out to see what's coming.



DulwichFox

rch,


Agree. Having gone to all this time and effort to make something that was, if we have been told right, only a means to heighten the aesthetics of that junction, then we might as well have something that actually achieves this.

Progress report...


5 bods on site .. 11.30. with 13 Blocks lined up to be lowered into place..

unfortunately no sign of the little machine that lowers them into place and the ground does not look

prepared to accept them.. seems like 2 - 3 blocks a day is the average..


I was in Berlin in the 70's.. a Junction the size or Hyde Park Corner was being resurfaced.

Dozens of lorries and machinery turned up Friday afternoon. 100's of road engineers worked around the clock

and the junction opened Monday morning.. and the technology in the 70's was less sophisticated.


It's a joke.. a few kerbstones and some paving.. ??


DulwichFox

I must have just missed you, DulwichFox, as I was there around the same time, chatting to the workmen.


They told me that now that they have the politically correct granite kerbstones in stock, they've discovered that the blocks specified by the Tooley Street Dictatorship are actually too heavy for human beings to lift, so they've had to have a special device fitted to the digger to lift them (which I had a good look at).


Now that everything is sorted, they now think that they should be done with the works "in a couple of weeks".

rch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> they've discovered that the blocks specified by

> the Tooley Street Dictatorship are actually too

> heavy for human beings to lift



Oh dear oh dear.


Advance planning yet again not their forte, eh?

It's more likely that all the new Tooley Street one-size-fits-all standards haven't actually filtered down to the management yet.


The workman I spoke to pointed at the "normal" kerbs across the street and said that they usually use those old-fashioned ones that they've been using for years. The Chinese kerbstones are huge... one could build a mini-Stonehenge with them!

Yes, I think it's the new highway specification for buildouts? It looks like they're using them up at the Townley junction, as well... must go up there and have a good look around.


BTW, going back to the troughs... I'll start a thread when the CGS funds are launched and we can all discuss bids.

Perhaps the build-out kerbs are much bigger than the "normal" kerbs in order to cause damage to any vehicle that clips them? Their design may include extra height so that it is less likely that a vehicle could mount the kerb, either by accident or design.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have seen troughs with 'hot lips' lobelia

> http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=https://thep

> lantfarm.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/salvia-hot-li

> ps.jpg&imgrefurl=https://theplantfarm.wordpress.co

> m/&h=640&w=640&tbnid=ZAftW5GE4SP4-M:&docid=2DirfyM

> lNddktM&ei=uh_bVd3xJMLWU56sq_AB&tbm=isch&ved=0CC4Q

> MygKMApqFQoTCN22lIftwccCFULrFAodHtYKHg in Wimeroux

> work very well - they are hardy and can be

> encouraged to be low growing by pruning. They grow

> OK in my garden in ED, so I suspect they would

> work on that site.


I thought these build-outs were to free up more pavement space on busy market days. Wouldn't adding obstacles like flower troughs in this space cancel that out? (Although the idea of prettying up the pavement environment is a sound one in principle)

I'd also hope we'd let the new space happen before deciding to fill it!

if we are going to fill it we have a real shortage of place for people to sit which we need to address - and was highlighted in the Living Streets reports about the walkability of the area.

James Barber wrote:-


They will hopefully calm traffic but primarily make the entrance to our market much more attractive.


Can I just remind everyone that 'our market' effectively operates only on Saturdays (I know it's available for operation on Fridays, but this is a very muted occasion generally) - and for only 12 of the 24 hours then - so for 13 fourteenths of the week the extended pavement is making only the entrance to a side street (one of many) 'more attractive'. And I am not sure why a wide stretch of empty pavement is peculiarly more attractive than a narrow(er) one. It would be good to put street seating there, of course, as it would be, I would argue, to have something growing there, although site lines on exiting the street are still an issue.


But to argue that this is really anything more than another attempt to strangle (sorry, calm) the free flow of traffic in LL would I think be naive - Southwark Council is not spending the sort of money it is on the build-out to beautify a market it doesn't really care about (it's a very middle class market, with virtually no 'real' street traders) - it's up to us to make our environment more attractive if we wish to - wide empty pavements don't do that for me, I'm afraid.


We could make something of the space, but it will probably end up as, at best, a cycle park - and give less space for pedestrians then before.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...