Jump to content

Recommended Posts

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Chimchiminee chimchiminee chimchimcheroo >:D

> Shall I complete that for you? :))


I know the next bit but its slightly different to your version.

  • 2 weeks later...

Probably unlucky to concede only the one considering we were in double figures for the on target chances. The sending off meant that the hammers 'parked the bus' which was fair enough actually.


The run in is going to be very exciting if a little nerve racking

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My intelligence is that we played

> the best football we have all season prior to the

> Sending Off and were unlucky to concede..



I heard this too and have to say I was (pleasantly) surprised. All we need to do now is keep 11 players on the pitch for a change and tell young Morrison not to be such a dick.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard this too and have to say I was

> (pleasantly) surprised. All we need to do now is

> keep 11 players on the pitch for a change and tell

> young Morrison not to be such a dick.


That didn't take long, he's not even played a game yet :)

I've just caught up with this sorry little tale on the beeb sport site.

3 things:

1. This little turd seems to nicely encapsulate everything that is making me fall out of love/lose patience with the game.

2. Should the BBC refer to the teams as Red Devils and Irons, what the hell is this, Shoot!?

3. That new look is just ..... awfullllll.....I mean reallly....reallllly.....bad!!!!

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> 2. Should the BBC refer to the teams as Red Devils

> and Irons, what the hell is this, Shoot!?


In that vein maybe he'll try and convince the FA he was calling his twitterfoe a bundle of twigs or a dish of pork offal or he could always rely on these guys for a back-up...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just caught up with this sorry little tale on

> the beeb sport site.

> 3 things:

> 1. This little turd seems to nicely encapsulate

> everything that is making me fall out of love/lose

> patience with the game.

> 2. Should the BBC refer to the teams as Red Devils

> and Irons, what the hell is this, Shoot!?

> 3. That new look is just ..... awfullllll.....I

> mean reallly....reallllly.....bad!!!!


Thanks EP, I've just had a massive nostlgia trip, does anyone else remember League Ladders?...what's wrong with the BBC using the term Red Devils, it's a great name ;-)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Thanks EP, I've just had a massive nostlgia trip,

> does anyone else remember League Ladders?...what's

> wrong with the BBC using the term Red Devils, it's

> a great name ;-)


Ah yes... you could have -

http://s3.e-monsite.com/2010/08/08/12/resize_250_250//Shoot---October-9th-1971.jpg or for 1p more http://s3.e-monsite.com/2010/09/01/03/resize_250_250//Goal---December-19th-1970---No-124.jpg until eventuallyhttp://s3.e-monsite.com/2010/09/03/07/resize_250_250//Shoot---May-10th-1975.jpg

I remember getting the 1st issue of Goal. My mum allowed me to replace my regular order at the newsagents of the Beano for this. The centre spread was usually a picture of a different football squad, all of which went up on my bedroom wall. This story had a sad ending though. I allowed my older brother to cut pictures out of some issues for a scrapbook of our favourite team. When completed he claimed sole rights to the scrapbook. I complained to mummy and he then cut all of 'my pictures' out and gave them back to me. This made a mess of his scrapbook and left me with useless pictures. There's a moral to this story I'm sure. I just haven't worked it out yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree that I enjoy seeing the variety of wild flowers growing naturally in the streets and would much prefer that they were not destroyed. (The South London Botanical Institute actually conduct wildflower identification walks on street wild flowers.) However, as the council consider themselves to be responsible for removing these plants, it's better that they now dig them out rather than spraying them with toxic herbicide, as they used to do - a step in the right direction.
    • It's interesting how local businesses and the people that own / work in them are not considered part of the "community". The dictionary says "a group of people living in the same place" as the principal definition. Why are we forced to accept a secondary definition where those who don't live in social housing, the vast majority of people in East Dulwich, are told to shut up?
    • They often grow in the angle between wall and pavement which could cause damage to the foundation of the wall and leave the council open to being sued.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...