Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Look at the Met Police crime map - it breaks 'East Dulwich' SE22 down into Wards (i.e. South Camberwell, Peckham Rye, East Dulwich, Village), and also breaks each of those SE22 wards into sub wards. It seems crime levels are low right across SE22.


http://maps.met.police.uk/ (put SE22 into Search box)


For distance to train station best use the map for guidance.

The crime/ safety thing it really just to help me narrow down a home search. I didn't want to have two properties to choose from, and to choose the one in a 'unsafe' part of town, when a quick question on the forums could sway me to the 'safer' place.


From what I can gather, theres is no area safer than the other, but I'm sure there are roads where you think "don't go down there after xx:xx".


EDIT:


After looking at the crime maps for the area, I'm looking at the numbers and types of crime (which are amazingly low for London btw) and am I right in saying alot of the reported incedents seem to be your average problems when you get a lot of pubs/bars in the area.

>> From what I can gather, theres is no area safer than the other,

>> but I'm sure there are roads where you think "don't go down there after xx:xx"


Nah I don't think it's that kind of area where certain streets are out of bounds late at night. You could also check out Google Maps to get more of a feel for individual roads. Personally I'd want to live 5 to 10 minutes from East Dulwich train station, and on a quiet street which for me would rule out anything on a bus route.

I live in Barry road which has seen two murders in a month and I have dwelt in this road for 7 years and have had no problems with any violence mugging etc.


I might go out tonight and get set upon by care in the community nutters or be mistaken for a drug dealer and get shot. You pays your money.................................even in the richest of areas including St Johns Wood, you take your choice.


Best of luck with a property bargain you should stick the boot in on price at the moment.

Im on Ferris currently (about to move to oakhurst) and I find that part of ED great as I am right in the middle of ED or Peck Rye stations so I have more choice of transport (which includes buses) rather than primarily being closer to the one of them and still only a 5 min walk to LL..


Hope you find the right spot for you!!

I don't think there are any "bad" roads.


In terms of safety, i think its a case of looking at each house and considering what it would be like getting home late at night - ie how close to the main roads, well lit etc. As you mentioned, crime is low in ED but it is still prudent to be careful and use the same amount of common sense you would anywhere.


I am on Goodrich which works well for me (and I have never felt unsafe), I have the Barry Road buses a couple of minutes in one direction, the LL buses a minute in the other direction, I can get to both Dulwich park and the busy part of LL in less than 10 minutes and it takes me 15 minutes to walk to the station!


In a perfect world the station would be 5 minutes closer (and go direct to town with no stops as the crow fly's - oh and not have packed commuted time trains) but then unless it was the station that moved the park would get further...... so actually on balance it's pretty darn good!


Oh and we have a very friendly corner shop that sells pretty much everything within a minutes walk!

Msgee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> move to Nunhead instead, and then you can fashion

> all the bundles of ?50s you save into a lovely

> comfy armchair.

>

> Then when you get bored of sitting on that you can

> go and spend them in the Man of Kent, Nunhead's

> premier nitespot/brasserie


BRILLIANT!






sigh

If I were you I would live as close to Lordship Lane as possible. That way you will be on the doorstep of the groundbreaking Adventure Bar, the atmospheric Magdala, the chav free Bishop and the countless organic bookmakers and take away restaurants. You'll have to pay a premium for your house but it's definately worth it.
we live just off the south (ish) end of LL, past the Magnolia. 10 mins from the station, 10 mins from dulwich park, 5 mins or so to the 'middle' of the hub of LL, 10 mins to peckham rye .... only problem is we are so close to LL and the busses are noisy but apart from that a great spot...

If you search most roads in ED, you?ll find a thread on here moaning about some attribute of said road ? from firework displays to rude van drivers, bloodied drive-by gangland slayings to child-abducting clowns.


The area sound positively horrible going by this ? you?re best off sticking a pin in a map.

I'd say avoid roads with carparks, carwashes, estates, those clogged with estate agents cars, known for street parties, have businesses backing on to them, have mad ppl as residents (i.e. those always intoxicated, clinically have a few screws loose), have badly behaved noisy children(young and teens)... anything else?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...