Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be honest they might as well dispense with the

> formalities, wheel-on an enormous phallus at the

> start of the show for them to intermittently gawp

> at, and then spend the next hour drinking sweet

> white wine and flicking through 'Heat' whilst they

> get their hair done.



Whilst smoking 40 Rothmans.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218840
Share on other sites

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> Cackling, screeching, end-of-the-pier,

> faked-tanned, Sheila's-Wheels insured, leering

> harpies.

>

> Does this or does this not mean that you like teh

> ( see what I did there) show "Bob"sy?


-------------------------------------------------------------




teh ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218898
Share on other sites

God, what a bunch of snobs! - what you have described is often the behaviour of lots of women on a girls night out - whether that's a bunch of perma tanned Essex girls or a bunch of yummy mummies knocking back the vino in Black Cherry.


I totally get it and I love it and not really sure why it's a big secret to be 'admitted' to.....lots of my friends love it too, all educated, bright ladies with careers, blah, blah,blah....


And I'm not surprised that you men don't like it and don't get it, you're not expected to.....and according to most blokes, women that are loud and having a good time without you are trampy 'cackling' harlots, etc, etc....maybe they just scare you a little?...Oh who cares, I love watching it if I'm around, makes me laugh and cheers me up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218974
Share on other sites

emc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God, what a bunch of snobs! - what you have

> described is often the behaviour of lots of women

> on a girls night out


Exactly.


Thus proving the rule that if you put more than six people of the same sex in a room and give them half a shandy each, they'll either get their tits out, or start comparing cock sizes (metaphorically speaking, of course).


However - fair do's - I'm prepared to admit it's current scheduling slot makes it the most exciting thing on television at that time (unless you're really into Bargain Hunt)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218995
Share on other sites

I have watched snippets of it when Bargain Hunt started to flag, or when I needed a break from one of Tim W's more outre weskits, so I suppose I'm not really in a position to give a fair and balanced view of the show.

But shag all that, I won't attempt to then.

What a desperate, blowsy bunch of superannuated wannabe ladettes.

All they need is a guest spot from Jenny Eclair to make the whole grisly package complete.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-219135
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...