Jump to content

Organic bush meat


cn150

Recommended Posts

I was thinking kangaroo or crocodile meat as I have a visitor from Australia coming soon (from near Perth). Is that not bush meat /bush tucker? What else does bush meat mean then? I think you can get farmed roo or croc meat, but I do like eating organic food generally, so I would prefer to get it organic if it is available.

"Bush meat" means wild meat, including monkeys, primates etc. There have been various rumours that you can buy this on Rye Lane, but no idea if they've ever been true. It's very illegal.


No idea about organic kangaroo/croc. But I can recommend iceland's kangaroo burgers, even if they don't say organic on them.

I think a butcher is really the wrong place for something like that, you'd be better off buying online. The seller should be able to tell you whether it's wild or farmed.


The point I was trying (perhaps badly) to make was that wild/game meat cannot be considered truly organic because it's not been fed a controlled diet.

cn150 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok, Borough Market - I'll try there, though

normally I just restrict my shopping to the local

> area of East Dulwich / Nunhead / Peckham to help

> maintain the local economy. Where specifically in

> Borough Market should I go (and what bus goes

> there)?


Good to here you are trying to source Locally reared Kangaroo and Crocodile..


Borough Market 40 bus from east Dulwich


G'day mate.


DulwichFox

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...