Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MP's claim a whole bunch of sometimes ludicrous and sometimes legitimate expenses, amounting to not much more than what they should be payed as a salary anyway = a mass feeding frenzy of condemnation


The mere suggestion of ID cards and the elected government tracking you = campaigns and righteous fury


the News of the World (and effectively the Sun) go illegaly fishing for tittle-tattle by hacking people's phones, listening to their voicemails and reading text messages and not a peeep!! And your future PM Cameron actually defends them!!!


What is the matter with people??


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5785465/Police-examine-News-of-the-World-phone-tap-claims.html


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/murdoch-papers-phone-hacking

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/09/newsoftheworld-newsinternational


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8141884.stm


Mail and Times seem less interested - gobsmackingly enough



(my pc isn't letting me tag links for some reason - sorry)

Good correction red devil


Given that Murdoch controls the news supply for a lot of people in the country it's possibly not surprising a lot of people may not know about it yet (which has long been an argument against his accumulation of media outlets)

Really silverfox?


Most big companies will say in their contracts with employees that their phones will be monitored at work. Ditto customers to those companies. Anything else is a big no no. Are you suggesting big companies are listening in to your personal phone calls at home and on your mobile?

No, I'm not important enough and have no terrorist inclinations. But if I was a big player, say going for a big banking position or sensitive govt position enquiries would be made into my background, lifestyle etc. Similarly, if I was a film star, there's big money to be made with tittle-tattle and gossip in our celebrity obsessed culture. For example, if I was editor of the NoTW and didn't have a posse of journalists and photographers waiting outside some hilltop village in Italy hoping for a scoop on Wayne Rooney's wedding I wouldn't be editor for long.


I'm not saying it's ethical or even legal, rather that it's commonplace.

Over one million sites on phone hacking tools, and your surprised Sean?? I think the politicians, should have there own little personal drone (remote control little helicopter filming) following them, seriously though, when techniques that are so obviously available to the public, cant believe politicians, people in the public eye aren't aware of phone tapping.

What do you think I'm surprised by antjen?


The fact that it goes on? Nope

The fact that politicians aren't aware? I disagree they aren't aware


The only thing I'm surprised by is the lack of public outcry now the facts have been published


I'm not as anti politician as many on here, but this isn't about them - it's the non-political figures. I have a hard time dealing with Vanessa Feltz, but the fact that she has been subjected to this by the NoTW absolutely repulses me. And yet the NoTW moralises regularly on teh conduct of politcians and others in the public sphere

Happens all the time Sean, but what I'm saying is its much closer to your own door, I put a thread up about peoples civil liberties "drones at Stonehenge" on this forum, technology taking away freedom and apart from honaloo posting a joke there was nothing, but no I wasnt surprised, the fact it has been published, makes me suspicious or do they really believe that we believe they didnt know, what kind of public outcry did you expect.

Civil liberties just aren't sexy. Sometimes when I've had a glass of red I'll start banging on about the erosion of civil liberties and the "thin end of the wedge" and I usually find that people's eyes glaze over. Maybe it's me that's not sexy!


There are so many celebs involved in this story that maybe that?ll be enough to sex it up and it will get the public outrage it deserves. God forbid they hacked Peter & Jordan, I can see the headlines in OK Magazine now! Hack into a cabinet minister?s phone and you?ll get a paragraph on page five; but Gwynnie Paltrow ? that?s front page news surely?


When exactly did I get this cynical?

Only thing is Antijen, Sean is referring to (allegedly) illegal ops. The examples you show are, to whatever degree, somehow justified by the powers that be under laws and regulations.


The NoTW (allegedly) has been naughty for using info obtained on it's behalf by private investigators using illegal methods. Their Royal correspondent, Clive Goodman, previously took the rap and went to prison for an earlier incident. Now we are being told the practice is more widespread and systemic. It is a scandal and there should be an outcry against such practices. I suspect this may be a slow-burner until more details are revealed.

Yes silverfox your right they were illegal methods but it has been argued time and time again, that these methods are being used on the public everyday within the law and are being abused, that to me equals illegal. It doesnt surprise me that the papers will behave in this way and I'm sure this is not just done to people in the public eye.

this bit?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXFIwnV3y0k&feature=related


You might mean a different one but still good


But I wouldn't want this to be a politicians v media debate. Politics is one thing and people have been absolutely vehement in there hatred of them


The media doing something like this seems to warrant a shrug - and they are arguably far more powerful

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

It's not over yet.


Phone operators say that over 100 accounts were hacked. Not "a handful".


Also, Max Clifford's lawyers have obtained disclosure of evidence that the NoTW wanted kept secret...


Jeremy Reed, Clifford's barrister, said the documents would help disprove the paper's claim that it generally did not do "naughty things".


He told the court: "The documents are likely to illustrate the modus operandi of the News of the World's journalists when seeking private and confidential information about individuals for the purposes of stories being written about them." Anthony Hudson, counsel for the News of the World, said the paper resisted the disclosure of the documents, arguing they were irrelevant to Clifford's claim and contained no information about the publicist.


He did not dispute the contents of the information commissioner's evidence which alleges that 27 News of the World reporters paid the investigator, Stephen Whittamore, to obtain personal data. One submitted 130 requests.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/feb/03/news-of-the-world-phone-hacking

I see Stuart Kuttner stepped down/was moved last summer. As managing editor he would have signed off/approved the invoices.


'Stuart Kuttner steps down as News of the World managing editor' http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/stuart-kuttner-news-of-the-world-managing-editor-steps-down

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...