Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BarryRoad bravely stuck his head above the parapet and declared himself an Aviation Geek.


I will join him in coming out of the hanger.


In any given crowd, I am the one staring at the small dot in the sky, saying "Ooh, whatsat?"


Any others out there? Come on, fess up, you know you want to. The burden lifts once you go public.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/707-massive-aviation-geeks/
Share on other sites

Good man Michael.


I'm even the 20+ Future Flight Greener by Design poster compeition winner 2006. I got a free PC (now loaded up with Microsoft Flight Simulator X, of course) and tickets to Farnborough IAS trade day, and... a model of the A380.


I also own a pair of Randolph Engineering aviators.


I do have my excuses, though. I was a student pilot at the age of 16, but when I found out I was colourblind and far too tall to make a career out of it I jacked it in. So I even have a general aviation headset!

Thats so cool. Do you ever, you know, wear the headset and aviators when playing the flight sim?;-)


Estonia is quite interesting planes-wise. Lots of Antonovs, Mils and Lets at the airport. I make sure I check-in EXTRA early to take it all in. Much the deep exasperation of my colleague whos stomps off to the bar.


Anybody do Airshows?

or Busshows?


You realise that there are only 3 people likely to read this thread of course.

  • 1 month later...
I was looking at planes over the weekend, and have a few questions for you aeris-punctums (could look it up I guess....). Anyways, how close can planes get (or how far apart should they be)? And what are the rules on the dumping of fule? Over Brixton seems to be popular......

When we was little my ma and pa got very worried about my older brother because they kept seeing him flat on his back in the garden. It transpired that he was simply laying down to get a more stable view through his binolulars of the planes flying overhead. (we used to live under the Luton Flightpath)


citizen

I've had a bit of a dig around and it seems that fuel-dumping is done to bring a plane to within certain weight tolerances on landing, and is usually only needed if a plane is forced to land early, say, if you have a swarthy employee on board taking a legitimate company flight.


What we witnessed was then probably the planes hitting a particularly warm humid pocket of air and leaving a brief contrail of water vapour, which is apparently quite commonly mistaken for fuel dumping (I know I did). The fact that it was happening at the same spot did rather make it look like they were picking on Brixton though.

Piers has it right re fuel-dumping. If airliners need to dump fuel then it is because there is an emergency - it would have to be done over the sea because dolphins like kerosene and people dont. If its not a really dangerous emergency they just fly in circles intil they have burnt off enough fuel Contrails are caused when a plane goes through humid air and the increased air pressure caused by jet engines or high velocity air streaming of the wing tips causes the water vapour to condense - they are often seen over South London as the planes descend into Heathrow or City airport.


Years ago I was sat beside Conningsby RAF base watching the planes take off and land. It was the cold war and an exercise was on so there were about 70 planes on the go. A Phantom (big jet fighter) declared an emergency on take off and dumped its fuel load on the immdiate vicinity (different rules apply to the military). I drove home stinking of aviation fuel - which if you are a plane geek, is a good thing.


Re the distance between planes - dont know, there is a limit when flying into an airport. If a plane flies into the disturbed air created by the plane infront the things can get very rough.


There is much discussion about reducing the distance between airliers flying in the main airways as new radars are more sensitive.

> Re the distance between planes - dont know, there

> is a limit when flying into an airport.

I was at Heathrow for the last concorde flights, and have a nice shot of three of them on the flight path for the final touch down. Must be about 2 miles apart, but obviously very hard to judge that sort f stuff in the air.


Sadly the hard drive the images are on went PHUT, so am deliberating spending ?????'s to get it recovered... :-(((((

i used to love flying when I was a kid and luckily for me my dad was an oil engineer so we were always travelling around throughout the 70s and early 80s. I just found the whole experience so exciting...particularly as there was a real sense of spirit amongst air crews from the stewardesses who were so friendly and beautiful to the pilots who were only too happy to let me sit in the cockpit for what seemed like hours at a time. I still have my little BOAC travel book that the pilots would sign after every flight and detailing how far we had flown, all points in between and what the weather had been like.


For want of a better word it just seemed so stylish... unlike today when the whole experience is about as glamorous and exciting as getting the National Express bus to Swansea.


I was driving over Battersea Bridge when the last Concorde came over and everyone stopped their cars and got out to have a look.... such a shame that they have been mothballed.


I like planes in general too.... my all time favourite has to be the P51D Mustang. When I'm rich I'm going to buy one!

BarryRoad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did a google on the aircraft spacing thing and

> haven't come up with anything. I left my private

> pilot's textbook at my mum's.

>

> I think it's something like 2nm horizontal and

> 1,000 feet vertical separation.


I've dropped a message to my nephew. He's currently undergoing his commercial pilot training in Oxfordshire. Not sure of he's done the "How not to hit anyone else" part of the course yet though.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was strafed* by a spitfire this time last year

> at a barbeque in Loughborough. Really made my day

>

> *he didn't actually fire his guns I hasten to add.


Has anyone heard the latest advert for the RAF on Virgin Radio. Starts of talking about an AWACS flying at a given height, then says this is kept there by the people on the ground. "The Technicians" (Then engine sound dies away) then other people get a mewntion and it creates the impression that it's the ground staff keeping it in the air. All well and good, then there is mention of protection from attack by enemy aicraft...then you hear a Stuka Siren building up, as if it's attacking it! Made I laugh!!! (For info on the Stuka, and a rousing Stuka marching song have a look at http://www.myunclewillies.com/about5.html2.html or this, for a true model...http://www.myunclewillies.com/about4.html1.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...