Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Having a possible stye on my right eyelid I wanted to have a good look.I soon found that I could close my left eye and see through my right eye. But the other way around, I couldn't.Meaning I couldnt close my right eye and keep my left one open.I'm left handed. Has this something to do with it?

Try it and let's see the results.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/72520-can-you-wink-with-both-eyes/
Share on other sites

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I play squash right handed, write left handed,

> golf right handed, pool and snooker left handed,

> lift a pint right handed. What does it mean...


You're sporty and like a drink?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can wink with both eyes. I can even do it with

> both eyes at the same time but it's blinking

> difficult and you probably shouldnt try it without

> appropriate training.


Is this what you mean Mick? If so when would do this? Extract from Winkapedia:


Both eyes (bat/flutter)[edit]

To close and open, or "wink", both eyes is usually an involuntary action known as a "blink". Though if done intentionally, in a particular way (such as once slowly or a few times in a row quickly), while giving a sweet or suggestive look with the eyes, often with the head tilted or at an angle in combination with the shoulders, is known as to "bat an eyelash", "bat/batting eyelashes", or "flutter/fluttering eyelashes". This is most commonly done by girls, as a way of flirting, showing interest, or in an attempt to persuade the receiver.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having a possible stye on my right eyelid I wanted

> to have a good look.I soon found that I could

> close my left eye and see through my right eye.

> But the other way around, I couldn't.Meaning I

> couldnt close my right eye and keep my left one

> open.I'm left handed. Has this something to do

> with it?

> Try it and let's see the results.


I'm a lefty and can only do the opposite to you! (if trying to look through just one eye, can only close my right eye. My left one won't open/close independently, it's a tad frustrating).

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan, basically you're stupid

>

> I bet you can't sneeze without looking at the

> light

>

> Really, a one eyed blinker...whatever next

>

> Btw, thoese Euro/pounds were well used in the last

> week or so



Eh? What light Seabag?


PS The pounds certainly will be by my son. Trust you had a good trip.

Only being able to wink on one side is very common - it's linked to which is your dominant eye for 'sighting'


It's also pretty common for your dominant eye to be on the opposite side from your dominant hand; lots of right handed people find they have to shoot left-handed because they can only close their right eye.

I was pretty handy at target shooting as a kid and fancied I might have been a sniper, except I couldn't kill an ant without begging for forgiveness or more importantly keep my left eye shut.


It was a common problem in the rifle club and some of the shooters sported pirate eyepatches

Well I have learnt something today because I thought that a "wink" was only a "wink" when executed with ONE eye.


I can blink...I mean...wink with both eyes. I write with right hand, pluck eyebrows with right hand, saw branches with both right and left arm and play football with left and right foot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...