Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does the amount you pay for something somehow

> affect the taste these days then?


I meant it was a false economy to buy cheap steak. You knew that....


Although most psychological tests show exactly that. Tell someone it's expensive wine and they'll tell you it tastes nicer than the same wine described as ?5 a bottle plonk.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You'd certainly hope that a more expensive steak

> is better than a cheap one! You can sometimes get

> a cheaper cut (bavette, flatiron, onglet) etc for

> ?12-?15 and it can be good, but it ain't gonna be

> the same as a nice ribeye from Hawksmoor, is it?



I don't even know what / where Hawksmoor is, which rather suggests it's not for the likes of me.

http://thehawksmoor.com/locations/seven-dials/


On the basis that even a cheapish steak will cost you ?15, worth spending ?30 at Hawksmoor and going half as often (whether that's once a month or once very few years). It is that good.


Closer to ED, tho still not really local, this place is excellent:


http://www.santamariadelsur.com/


Actually in or near ED I'd go with Franklins, or the Palmerston.

I thought this was going to be an exciting thread about vampires in East Dulwich ...but sadly proved wrong.....


noticed tonight that the French restaurant on lordship lane does skirt steak at ?12 with chips... Maybe an option especially if marinaded well and cooked properly...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...