Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't. I'd spend it on drink, drugs and loose

> women. The rest I'd fritter away.

-----------------------------------------------------


Thinking about it I have spent about that already on the above....



Loved every minute, even the ones I cant remember.

I think I've already spent 500k on drink.


Lets see:

How much would that be per week?

Age now 42 - 18 = 24 years * 52 weeks = 1248 = ?400 per week.


Well may be not, but I might do the 500k by the time I'm 70. Especially if the price of beer in ED keeps going up the way it is.

We now have the ?3.50 a pint in Franklins, and thats just a normal bar.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> could you do all that with a million though?


Nae problem daizie. Nae problem.


Shared flat in South Central London: My share ?125,000. Country bolthole ?250,000.


Spanish holiday home ?250,000 to add to existing home.


Change= ?375,000....(tu)


Almost forgot: Mobile Home ?80,000 and Campervan ?15,000.


Female Fund-For Entertainment thereof ?100,000.:)-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...