Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't. I'd spend it on drink, drugs and loose

> women. The rest I'd fritter away.

-----------------------------------------------------


Thinking about it I have spent about that already on the above....



Loved every minute, even the ones I cant remember.

I think I've already spent 500k on drink.


Lets see:

How much would that be per week?

Age now 42 - 18 = 24 years * 52 weeks = 1248 = ?400 per week.


Well may be not, but I might do the 500k by the time I'm 70. Especially if the price of beer in ED keeps going up the way it is.

We now have the ?3.50 a pint in Franklins, and thats just a normal bar.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> could you do all that with a million though?


Nae problem daizie. Nae problem.


Shared flat in South Central London: My share ?125,000. Country bolthole ?250,000.


Spanish holiday home ?250,000 to add to existing home.


Change= ?375,000....(tu)


Almost forgot: Mobile Home ?80,000 and Campervan ?15,000.


Female Fund-For Entertainment thereof ?100,000.:)-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation for Maurice Hinds! He installed a new handbasin in my small bathroom, and did a lovely job.  I would absolutely recommend Maurice for plumbing work.  He is very helpful, friendly and did a tidy and efficient job, and his work is reasonably priced. 
    • Sure. He is ideological driven on many things. He was the person that defended the blanket CPZ policy because he believed that 'if you asked most people in southwark if all parking should be paid for, most would say yes'. A completely unfounded belief not backed by any evidence. In the real world, that policy caused significant local electoral damage for some councillors. I personally see his disillusion with the Labour Party as one of his idealism vs the reality of governance. He will probably be much happier with the Greens.
    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...