Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't. I'd spend it on drink, drugs and loose

> women. The rest I'd fritter away.

-----------------------------------------------------


Thinking about it I have spent about that already on the above....



Loved every minute, even the ones I cant remember.

I think I've already spent 500k on drink.


Lets see:

How much would that be per week?

Age now 42 - 18 = 24 years * 52 weeks = 1248 = ?400 per week.


Well may be not, but I might do the 500k by the time I'm 70. Especially if the price of beer in ED keeps going up the way it is.

We now have the ?3.50 a pint in Franklins, and thats just a normal bar.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> could you do all that with a million though?


Nae problem daizie. Nae problem.


Shared flat in South Central London: My share ?125,000. Country bolthole ?250,000.


Spanish holiday home ?250,000 to add to existing home.


Change= ?375,000....(tu)


Almost forgot: Mobile Home ?80,000 and Campervan ?15,000.


Female Fund-For Entertainment thereof ?100,000.:)-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He’s on the tree trunk outside the groundspeople’s yard - near the car park
    • I agree that I enjoy seeing the variety of wild flowers growing naturally in the streets and would much prefer that they were not destroyed. (The South London Botanical Institute actually conduct wildflower identification walks on street wild flowers.) However, as the council consider themselves to be responsible for removing these plants, it's better that they now dig them out rather than spraying them with toxic herbicide, as they used to do - a step in the right direction.
    • It's interesting how local businesses and the people that own / work in them are not considered part of the "community". The dictionary says "a group of people living in the same place" as the principal definition. Why are we forced to accept a secondary definition where those who don't live in social housing, the vast majority of people in East Dulwich, are told to shut up?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...