Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lady M when I reached 1000 posts on the forum I

> posted it and then 1001.....I think you missed

> yours (1600ish already) watch and learn ;-)



*curtseys most respectfully in acknowledgement of being taught by a Master*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-288059
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 9 months later...

In the absence of Quids.


DECISION:


Diplomatic Immunity Plea rejected.


Grounds: failure of the defendant to satisfy this Court that he is entitled to diplomatic immunity. Moreover, Exhibit A (threads from the EDF) corroborates this by providing irrefutable evidence of an inability to conduct himself remotely diplomatically contrary to the EDF Regulations as laid out by Mark.


Sentence:


(1) Community Service Order:

You are required to keep the streets of ED free of snow, ice and dog poo for a period of one month.


You are to assist cooking-challenged forumites with various cooking tasks. Tasks to include:


- showing Katie1997 how to cook rice without the benefit of a rice cooker

- demonstrating to HAL9000 how to peel/crush garlic and extract juice from lemons

- aiding Helen Graves with the peeling of some 5 billion chick peas.


Furthermore, you are to give a demonstration on how to bake the best Irish Soda Bread. This demonstration to take place at 8pm 10th December at the next EDF Drinks.


(2) Exclusion Order:

You are to refrain from posting in The Lounge for a period of one month. Conversely you are obliged to post in the Drawing Room at least 50 times a day. Any inappropriate postings will result in your facing a specialist panel comprised of: Huguenot, Mockney Piers and DJKillaQueen.


(3) Curfew Order:

You are not at liberty to attend the EDF's offices for a period of one month except for the purpose of feeding and combing the Forum's mangey and flea-ridden pet dog: Woofmarkthedog.


(4) Probation order:

You are required to report to SeanMacGabann twice daily.


(5) Supervision Order:

Power is hereby given to Quids who will take overall responsibility for your supervision. Should you fail to keep the peace and/or conduct yourself in a manner appropriate to ED folk, Quids may issue whatever further penalty he deems appropriate. This could include, but is not limited to, installing you in the specially erected stocks on Goose Green where the yummy mummies of ED and their sprogs would be encouraged to have a field day (egged on by the likes of HonaloochieB, karter and VerryBerryCherry). Such an "event" would be supervised by Mick Mac.


( 6) Forfeiture Order:

For breach of Rule 5.6(A)III(xi) of Master Quids' 100s Game, your falsely claimed 100 is to be surrendered immediately and given instead to the more worthy player: Ladymuck.


You have 7 days in which to lodge an appeal with Legalbeagle.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-389578
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thieving?


Well! I simply cannot permit such an allegation to go unchallenged.


Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968 states that: a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. Yes indeedy.


Was there dishonesty? Nope. We are talking about a pursuit created by the elusive Master Quids. I, for once, abided by the rules. You could have played, but failed to do so in time. In other words, you lack the necessary speed and proficiency for the game.


Was there appropriation? Well, I guess it could be argued that there was. BUT...as dishonesty is manifestly absent from your most ungracious charge, then the appropriation becomes irrelevant.


Was there property? Again yes, but without the element of dishonesty you don't have a toe to stand on. Not a carpal.


Did it involve property belonging to another? Nope. The 6000 was available for all to play. Though for the avoidance of doubt, I should state that the 6,000 now firmly belongs to the highly skilled moi. Oooooh yes.


Was there an intention to permanently deprive? Of course there was! That's the point of the game. You had your chance, but you blew it.


*thinks: AMATEUR*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7567-100s/page/3/#findComment-393610
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
    • I see what you mean.  Perhaps the "alcohol licensing flyer for Tesco Express on the Poundland site" confirmed by the OP has been removed then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...