Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, I appreciate that it's all a bit of 'mischief'. It's just that there are certain members of this forum that harbour less than honourable racial beliefs who will use this as an excuse to get a blatant yet cleverly manipulated message across.


I think Huguenot knows that.

...when rival baboons fight over who gets the biggest nuts.


Well, that seems to support the theory that football violence evolved in our Hominoidea ancestors.


It is believed the violence flared between the rival supporters after an argument over who would be the first to grow opposable thumbs.


However, this bit seems to imply that it coincided with the evolution of unidexterous w@nking - an activity confined to the Hominidae!


????: I'm not sure about the scientific credentials of that article you cited.

Good thread.


I mentioned it to my Jamaican friend "Tiny"-6 Foot 8" and we started to reminisce about the time Tiny ( then Leader of the Millwall Firm) stabbed 6 Aston Villa supporters single-handedly, in the leg, at Villa Park.

Around 1968/69 I think it was.


He laughed about the time he came across Cass Pennant, one of the main ICF Boys and they took a stroll down memory lane and remembered when The Birmingham "Zulus" came to London and tried to take liberties with West Ham and Millwall.


Memories.


btw: What WAS this thread about?


p.s. I don't really know "Tiny" but he was the main Man for many a long day....

:

T'would be a sad day BBW, if we were to ban satire on the grounds that public ridicule brings succour to the insane. :'(



How very dare you:X succour has always been our National Sport and you do not have to be "certified" to enjoy it...:-$


I realise that we are all 'aving a larf but is anyone suggesting that Whites are more inclined to Football violence in England?


If so full set of stats and data, per club, per year, per decade to give substance to this view please Guys.


Obviously personal anecdotes or observation , over say 50 years or more, do not count.


So even if, almost every time one has read about succour violence since the Mid-1960's in The UK it seems Whites were/are involved most of the time, and even if we could give an "educated" guess that most future football hooligan stories will involve, predominantly Whites, then that is, obviously, insubstantial and irrelevant.


We need official proof!


Hugo, do you wanna play "ball"(?)


This could be a hot potato so ....catch M8...:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...