Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi shareofhouse,

The BBC link isnt working but got there via the other link.

It states 294 public bodies since 2009 have been banned some like Southwark permanently. It cited not sending back contracts in timely manner - presumably they charge a fee and I can guess how long it takes to get a legal department to check a contract especially as it will have onorous clauses - that's likely to require senior management committee authority.


I'm a member of the Audit & Goverance committee. I'll ask that it's added to the agenda as clearly something happened and councillors have not been made aware. I;l let you know what I find.

Hi James


This may have already been addressed elsewhere on the forum but, as the situation doesn't appear to be changing, I wondered if you know who is responsible for the area around the footpaths up to the platforms at ED station. The new lights outside the station are lovely (thank you), but the litter is an eyesore (which is especially bad when this is the first part of ED any visitors might see) and a danger to any wildlife living in that area.


Any help with this would be much appreciated. Thank you! :)

Hi EDLove,

Yes I agree it's hugely embarassing that so much litter is dropped let alone not picked up at our station.

Southern.

I regularly contact them about East Dulwich station issues. Litter is always mentioned and I've asked how we can permanently sort it out. But its all becoming a horrible grot spot.

Would anyone be interested in forming a Friends group?


Regards james.

Hi Rhinestone Cowboy,

We were going to have a conference call - local ED and Peckham Rye councillors with the cabinet councillor and officers. Sadly conference calls are beyond Southwark Council. I kid you not.


So instead we've been asked to give to give our written feedback.


I've lent my support that the Friern Road experimental traffic order be made permanent. Number of reasons including traffic evaporation, safer area around the school and cycle provision.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The planning application for new 100+ nursery places at Crown House, 41-43 East Dulwich Road was refused by > Southwark Council but the applicant has appealeded it.It was refused as the council doesnt think they've made enough > efforts to lease it as office spaces portecting local > employment. And also no transport report.

>

> The former is odd as with such huge shortages of nursery places many are unable to go back to work. So this feels a > red herring or illconceived. The transport issues interesting. When the council applied next door it was allowed BUT > on the condition they produce a Travel Plan.

>

> So I've contacted the planning inspector who will decide the appeal supporting the application IF a condition for a > Travel Plan is added. The planning inspector can be contacted at: [email protected] reference APP/A5840/A/12/2185756/NWF

>

> What's very frustrating is that until May 2012 this planning application would have been decided

> by the dulwich Community Council but instead

> council officers miles away made the decision -

> wrongly in my mind.


Just been notified that the appeal was successful. Please see attached.

Hopefully this nursery will proceed providing 100+ places. Chuffed to see my support reflected in the write-up of why the appeal was successful.

James


Not sure if this has been brought to your attention before but on Lordship Lane all the pavements have parts which now puddle quite badly in places.

It's particularly deep in patches between the Police station and Calloway Locks.


Any chance of getting the contractors back do the job properly ?

Hi fazer71,

Yes, their are a number of puddles around there. The problem in many cases is the private pavement areas.

If you felt able to list the puddles on council highway I'd be happy ot raise them all as requests to be fixed.

Hi James


Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.


I'm sorry to hear that even your requests are not being listened to by Southern because, as you say, the area is quite embarassing.


Can they just keep failing to deal with it? Would it make much difference if the contact details of the relevant person(s) at Southern were given so that those who care about it enough are able to exert some additional pressure?


Thanks again.

Hi EDLove,

I've also reported the broken light at the top of the ramp from platform 2.


If they keep failing to clean it then I believe we have recourse to an Environmental Act. Bit atomic but if its not fixed by the middle of next week will start that ball rolling. Might need a private posecution which would be interesting if relationship destroying.


Hi Fazer71,

I feel guilty for asking but it would be immensely helpful. With have a little sum of money we could use if we precisley document what we're asking for.


Hi TopTree,

Will look into organising this again - we did this two years ago with expectation it would be come a regular maintenance habit. How wrong.

James I asked you the following on the M&S thread, but decided to post here as you had not replied:


James,


Thank you. Do you know what the amended plan AA is? I have tried and failed to access this document several times.


This document is listed at the top of the apllication as follows:


Amended plan 1121/P (--)154 REV PE - PROPOSED SECTION AA 2013-02-21



Please noet the date for this. Still no sign of a decision.

Hi first mate,

I've been assured this week by the officers concerned that will officially release their decision - to refuse.


The Southwark website documents often confuse PC's and you need to press "Ctrl -" to reduce the size and then miraculouly the document appears. Please try that.


regards james.


EDITED To make it clear "Ctrl -"

Dear James Barber, if businesses are responsible for pavements at the front/side of their premises as area is within their curtilage and therefore do not need permission or a licence from the council to put tables & chairs out eg EDT, then can it be proper for council street sweepers to sweep the said areas?
Hi James Barber,thanks for the reply. Interesting, but not quite sure how tables & chairs that can't be walked over,negociated with a wheelchair or pram makes a pavement wider as it is unusable? Maybe I'll take down my front garden fence and get it cleaned for free!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...