Jump to content

Drawing Room - Yay or Nay?

Keef

By Keef
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf

bigbadwolf

Posted
Posted

"I'm sure you could control yourself if you put your mind to it."


Not likely.


I think that the drawing room will survive but it wont flourish at the rate it's creators may have hoped. This is because, as Keef stated, contributors want to come across as knowledgable about the subject they debating. There's nothing wrong with that because it is a place where facts and sources are going to be expexted. This is where the growth of the drawing room will be stunted.


These facts and figures will have to sought out either on the internet or through other means and on many occasions when a contributor has their case in order with all their sources at hand they'll find that the arguement/discussion has moved on from where they were going to pick up. They may then see no point in carrying on where they left off because they may be afraid of being shouted down by those who see the old point/case as irrelevant to what is being discuused and could acuse others of backtracking or swaying the arguement in their favour.


I don't really object to other forum members wanting a decent discussion and I don't really mind being excluded from it either as I come on here for humour. I'm constantly pissing about so I wouldn't blame the drawing room crowd ignoring me either. I see it as dull and want no part in it.


The lounge is where it's all at.

Tony.London Suburbs

Tony.London Suburbs

Posted
Posted

Where its NOT "all at" is consistently spelling "arguement" with an "e" that does not exist.


The verb is, obviously, to "argue" but the "e" is dropped when it comes to using the word: argument.


p.s. Can you reproduce your comment about my male appendage as the Subject interests me.

bigbadwolf

bigbadwolf

Posted
Posted

"Where its NOT "all at" is consistently spelling "arguement" with an "e" that does not exist.


The verb is, obviously, to "argue" but the "e" is dropped when it comes to using the word: argument."


Although I'm often viciously rude and cheeky towards you Tony I wonder what path my grammar would take without your guiding wisdom.


"p.s. Can you reproduce your comment about my male appendage as the Subject interests me."


I don't think that would be wise after today's carry on.


Another time perhaps.

????

????

Posted
Posted
BBW other than the clowns thing that got deleted, you and mick find anywhere where I've got away with anything in the Drawing Room? The difference between you and I is that I know where to be an arse and where to play it straight and you don't....watch and learn pinhead....Mick's just joining in 'cos his betting's going seriously down hill since he started the betting thread
Tony.London Suburbs

Tony.London Suburbs

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hey Tone - I thought you were out with a lady

> today - why back so soon?


Visited her in Sarf London, Mick.


Been back for a while after she picked up her Son from her Sisters.:-$


Betting on The Del Potro/Cilic match in-running at the moment M8.

Tony.London Suburbs

Tony.London Suburbs

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

Nice work Tone. I assume you look younger than your tender years to be capable of entertaining girls in their 30s?


More like act younger Mick.:)


Truth is I met all of Ladies I see now around 10/12 years ago when I DID look much younger and a few of them have stayed good friends since then and the main "3" are all exactly 30 years old, by co-incidence..


Though the Ladyfriend who is staying with me ( for the 3rd time) told me tonight that I have grown up since she first met me 6 years ago and, sadly, she's right::o


Have to say that I have no emotional baggage though, which helps. No exs around, no marriages/divorces/kids etc..so I have lived the "single life" for a long time now.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> Nice work Tone. I assume you look younger than

> your tender years to be capable of entertaining

> girls in their 30s?

>

> More like act younger Mick.:)

>

> Truth is I met all of Ladies I see now around

> 10/12 years ago when I DID look much younger and a

> few of them have stayed good friends since then

> and the main "3" are all exactly 30 years old, by

> co-incidence..

>

> Though the Ladyfriend who is staying with me ( for

> the 3rd time) told me tonight that I have grown up

> since she first met me 6 years ago and, sadly,

> she's right::o

>

> Have to say that I have no emotional baggage

> though, which helps. No exs around, no

> marriages/divorces/kids etc..so I have lived the

> "single life" for a long time now.




Do you use the Lynx Bullet, Tony?


Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
Posted

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My counterpart is SAL9000. I'm not programmed to

> boast, but since we became operational on 12

> January 1992, our babies have taken over almost

> every desktop throughout the world - and beyond.



...your babies are indeed "ubiquitous" ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • WomblingFree
      Oh Rachel....

      By WomblingFree · Posted

      I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Sephiroth
      Oh Rachel....

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    • first mate
      Oh Rachel....

      By first mate · Posted

      Now who might that be?
    • beansprout
      Oh Rachel....

      By beansprout · Posted

      Harvey and Wheeler in Dulwich Village? Only one I know… How can they offer to apply and never did? Surely; whether they are managing the property or not and with tech been so advanced I would have thought they would have been a couple of e mails sent as a reminder or, is it the Landlord’s responsibility to apply… Rental Law/ Bill has just come  into force  - can’t remember if it was this week or last and have been to busy to read.. However, will as assume it is not individual councils but all councils. Came up on Which on line.. Good point Jen Jen Jen - sure some knowledgable person on here can throw more light than I.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...