Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't see how it can possibly have been an "illusion", assuming that he did actually publicly state these numbers in advance of the draw and that is on record?


Edited to say: Ooops sorry, I wrote the above before I looked at the link, obviously he didn't actually predict them but somehow inserted the "correct" balls before they were shown after the draw.


:-$

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He did not turn the balls round AT THE TIME the

> numbers were called up on BBC1. Someone dressed in

> black on the black background or something?



someone in black would have shown up against the bare brickwork behind him!! Heard someone suggesting they may have been projected onto the balls... v clever idea as for a 10 min programme there's now 2 days of free advertising for Friday's show!

Ok to put you all out of your misery.



He records 22 million shows , thats one show per numeric permutation.


They then broadcast the "correct" show of Derren "winning"


He wins 3 million odd, so the show costs ?19 million ( tickets @ ?1 each ) in real terms to make plus recording costs.



See ....ehhh....good illusion .....it took a minute to figure it out & i dont do suduko's either.




W**F


*If you ask I'll explain the Lehmans collapse next *

Of course he got all the right numbers!


But only revealed them after they'd been announced. So not as impressive as we all thought it would be.


The split-screen camera theory seems plausible... the hidden inkjet printers maybe possible too. I'm pretty sure we can rule out projection, as I don't think you can project a black image onto a white background. He obviously can't have recorded all possible outcomes (I know woof was only joking, but apparently some people actually believe this is possible).


It's obviously just a good illusion, but I have a feeling he'll try and dress it up as something more.

One way to perform this illusion:


The prediction balls are prepared using a white or clear light-sensitive plastic or ink.


Six blank balls are placed on a stand.


Outside of the audience's field of view, an Ultra Violet or Infra Red laser printing projector is focused onto the blank balls.


The illusionist uses a piece of card, ostensibly to write down the winning numbers, but in fact to hide his right hand while it enters the winning numbers onto a hidden key pad as they are revealed.


Once all the numbers are drawn, a computer sorts them into ascending order and directs the laser to project onto each ball an image of the appropriate number which immediately becomes visible.


The illusionist then turns the freshly laser-printed balls towards the audience to reveal six balls each imprinted with a winning number.


Voil?!


All the necessary materials are available on line - see links:


http://store.sundancesolar.com/enbeaduvsenb.html

http://www.matsui-color.com/ColorChangingPaint_PlasticColorChangeUV.html

http://mhest.com/supparticles/Color-changing-inks.pdf

http://www.amazing1.com/uv_lasers.htm

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Correct link!


That explanation seems too obvious to me - I'd be very disappointed if it were true.


Derren Brown has always claimed that he doesn't use trick photography. This would be a first for him.


However, the displacement of the ball on the far right of the stand could have been caused by thermal expansion during laser printing. If the balls were heat-printed from left to right then one might expect the last ball to pop up slightly.

notice that derren goes quiet as the numbers are released...hmm why?

Methinks that the studios mics are then silenced so that the shuffling around isnt heard

then turned on again when the balls have been switched

if he spoke during this period his own mic might pick up whats going on just to side of him on the split screen

the sound of the TV was probably fed to the viewer and not heard in the studio

Playing it back on Youtube, I think the switch from the frozen screen back to 'live' happens as Derren repeats back the numbers, somewhere between him saying 23 and 28 - its at that point the first ball suddenly 'elevates' and also there's a fraction-of-a-second skip in the tape.....

Derren Brown performs notoriously inscrutable illusions. Nothing is ever what it seems with him - even his revelations leave one with more questions than answers. There's always a twist.


If the majority of viewers got the impression that it was a split-screen video effect then that is probably part of the illusion. Give him some credit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...