Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know it wasn't free, but does anyone remember

> back in the early 90's the tabloids would carry an

> offer that would allow you a ferry crossing for

> ?1.


I think that was in the short-lived News On Sunday or whatever it was called.

Even I wasn't common enough to read that.

Jesus you have to have standards. Even if it's only Evening ones.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Imagine my excitement when I discovered that today

> the Mail on Sunday was printing an exclusive

> extract of the latest Dan Brown novel. stae


---------------------------------------------------------


The Mail anyday..............For F**K sake it's a sh*thole piece of journalism.


Loose weight now are supermodels to skinny watch out eastern europeans are taking over the police state is good see your star prediction




W**F

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Imagine my excitement when I discovered that

> today

> > the Mail on Sunday was printing an exclusive

> > extract of the latest Dan Brown novel. stae

>

> --------------------------------------------------

> -------

>

> The Mail anyday..............For F**K sake it's a

> sh*thole piece of journalism.


Woof, are you kidding me?

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come now Tony, even you can't read the Mail (I'm

> not sure it won't be &$@*!ed on the EDF)


Stopped buying papers 5 years ago when I received my 7 week bill for over ?100....


End of game for me and I haven't missed them one iota...

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > RosieH Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Imagine my excitement when I discovered that

> > today

> > > the Mail on Sunday was printing an exclusive

> > > extract of the latest Dan Brown novel. stae

> >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -------

> >

> > The Mail anyday..............For F**K sake it's

> a

> > sh*thole piece of journalism.

>

> Woof, are you kidding me?


-------------------------------------------------


RosieH


Kidding ?


I would rather tie a rope round my scrotum and be dragged naked by a lame goat across the abrasive quartzite surface of the Hindu Kush in the depths of a hard winter than read that paper, as for Dan Brown his pages could make a fire to warm the goat.



W**F

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> I would rather tie a rope round my scrotum and be

> dragged naked by a lame goat across the abrasive

> quartzite surface of the Hindu Kush in the depths

> of a hard winter than read that paper, as for Dan

> Brown his pages could make a fire to warm the

> goat.

>

>

> W**F


My goodness. I'd rather read almost anything than be dragged naked across the quarzite blahdiblah. I think you need to rethink your principles. It's just a paper.

"My goodness. I'd rather read almost anything than be dragged naked across the quarzite blahdiblah. I think you need to rethink your principles. It's just a paper."


Moos.


If given the choice between being dragged by your hair by a lame goat across the quarzite surface of the Hindu kush or reading the contents of my diary from my formative teenage years which would you choose?


Think carefully now.

iaineasy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As Dulwichmum would put it, "Adolescent musings

> from the top bunk".

>

> Mainly a lot of playing "hard to get", with

> myself.

>

>

>

> Mainly a lot of playing "hard to get", with

> myself.

> --------------------

>

> get a grip man.


----------------------------------------------------


Left or right hand Iaineasy ?




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...