Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you go down to the "woods" today

It won't be a big surprise.

If you go down to the "woods" today

You won't believe your eyes.


A few scrubby trees and maybe a grave

It's not at all something you'd wanna save

Not really somewhere you'd wanna have a pic-nic.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The campaign have a petition with over 8,500

> signatures. They've confirmed addresses for

> neighbouring ward they have around 1,500

> signatures which means they have around 17% of the

> electorate there.

>

> So I think the poster is quite reasonably stating

> huge anger etc.



Most people told that the council are intending to "destroy woodland" will sign a petition without bothering to investigate further.


The first I heard of all this (I think - it was a while ago now) was when I was asked to sign a petition in North Cross Road during the busy market.


I don't sign things without being quite sure what I'm putting my name to. I said I needed to look into it further.


Most people will just sign, particularly with the emotive language being used by this group.


I even know people who have got involved in a fundraising event for this, who had absolutely no idea that there is another side to the story.


ETA: Sorry just seen Penguin's post above making a similar point.

Penguin - didn't you ask the administrator to move the discussion of a new Sainsburys in Dulwich Village to the Lounge, on the grounds that it isn't in East Dulwich? So, why aren't you asking for this one to be moved? Or is your choice of topics to get moved selective?
You may be confused with a post I made seeking clarification from Admin about the area that could be included in the Main section. As for Camberwell Old Cemetery, it may not be within East Dulwich Ward but with an SE22 postcode it is clearly in East Dulwich. Where do you think it is?

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They've confirmed addresses for

> neighbouring ward they have around 1,500

> signatures which means they have around 17% of the

> electorate there.


What does this mean?


How was it done?


Who did it?

> Not read the docs. Somebody summarise please. Some

> trees being removed because....?


They are removing the trees (they don't actually know how many) to provide about 4 years worth of burial, they are going to spend about 2 million pounds on this part of the project. This is on top of the on average subsidy to the burial service of 200k a year from the tax payer.


After the 4 years is up they are going to be back to square one and will have to look for somewhere else. My guess is they will be back on the Rec or maybe the allotments but who knows. They won't look further a field because that will involve the private sector and as this is a Labour council - the private sector is BAD. The fact that most of the money is going to private contractors is fine though for some reason.

clockworkorange Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penguin68. Yes.

> Petitions quite literally not worth the paper

> they're written on without the checks you suggest.

>

>

> Not read the docs. Somebody summarise please. Some

> trees being removed because....?


I'm agnostic on this issue, but in the interests of balance, how do you anti-the save "Southwark Woods" bridgade know whether the petition represents genuine sentiment? Do you know the checks on the data haven't been made? Do you know that (paraphrasing an earlier poster) people have signed this unconsidered/unresearched/thoughtlessly?


There's a lot of hyperbole on both sides of this debate it would seem.

Penguin - didn't you ask the administrator to move the discussion of a new Sainsburys in Dulwich Village to the Lounge, on the grounds that it isn't in East Dulwich? So, why aren't you asking for this one to be moved? Or is your choice of topics to get moved selective?


For the record I have never asked for any threads to be moved anywhere (other than reporting SPAM posts) - as I live only 2 minutes walk from the Old Cemetery, and walk there very regularly - as I have done for much of the nearly 30 years I have lived in SE22 - I see this as very much in East Dulwich - and I even believe that parts are contiguous to ED ward itself - which I am not - even if no-one in the cemetery is now an elector.

You may all want to go and buy the November National Geographic. It's all about trees and Climate Change. And then we can all have a collective think about priorities for the very last pieces of open space cities have.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/climate-change/special-issue/

I imagine well over half of you have children. As I do. If we don't act our children are ****ed. The choice in this thread is to gaze into the branches of a tree and remember how much you loved someone or to look at a hole in the ground surrounded by cement and think how much it cost and how the clocks ticking on your right to use the space before those bones are chucked out, the plastic geegaws shoveled away and the barren ground sprayed for weeds

Urban Green infrastructure is an important aspect of global warming both as a preventative measure and in terms of minimising the consequences. That is well known and understood by most government agencies and political parties.


http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/urgp_benefits_of_green_infrastructure.pdf/$FILE/urgp_benefits_of_green_infrastructure.pdf


If it was the case that LBS were doing a like for like habitat remediation then I might see that the urban greening argument was countered but there is no evidence that is actually the case. They don't know how many trees are actually coming down - they have changed the definition of "a tree" from being 7.5cm to 15cm dim simply for the sake of the plans and you just have to go around the sites with the plans to see most of the tree locations are made up and some significant trees are missing - and these are big 80 cm girth oaks that it will take 40 years to re-grow totally missing. Plus there is no point - we can save the scrubby wild bit of the cemetery, we can provide some in-borough burials and we can save millions of pounds.


Regarding the point about the Groundwater Protection Zones. Both sites are the Ground Water Protection zone for the reservoir.


http://maps.environment-agency.gov.uk/wiyby/wiybyController?x=531500.0&y=181500.0&topic=groundwater&ep=map&scale=5&location=London,%20City%20of%20London&lang=_e&layerGroups=default&distance=&textonly=off#x=535317&y=174491&lg=1,10,&scale=9


The environment agency has specific guidelines about cemeteries in SPZs. It is a reasonable question to ask whether the Environment Agencies guidelines have been met for the new burial areas.


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290462/scho0404bgla-e-e.pdf


It is true that the deep clay means that the risk of ground water contamination is low but that just means the risk of surface water contamination is higher. Plus the artificials, incidents of groundwater flooding and potential for elevated groundwater in the surrounding area identified in LBS 2011 GWF assessment was not addressed by the planning officer.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/12398/appendix_c2_-_swmp_-_groundwater_assessment


Regarding whether it is a wood or not - just go and look for yourself. Although it is interesting that it is always the people trying to protect it that say that.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's on their web-site suggesting cut-and-paste

> comments to use.

>

> It's very funny.

>

> "This site is within the 400 day catchment area of

> the River Peck Basin and is

> an SPX1 site for groundwater collection for

> drinking water. Southwark council

> has carried out no detailed work with Environment

> Agency officers to assess the

> negative environmental impacts of new burials from

> this development on water

> pollution"


This is the allegation about groundwater pollution.

Just to get the environmental cat out of the bag, one cremation (the chosen alternative of the mavens here):- uses as much energy in the form of gas and electricity as a 500 mile car trip, and releases a staggering 400 kilos of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, not to mention mercury vapour and other pollutants.


In the UK in 2013, over three quarters of funerals end in a cremation. With a death rate of around half a million people every year, this means around 375,000 cremations are taking place annually, potentially releasing some 150,000 tons of carbon dioxide into the air above us. These figures look at the actual carbon cost of burning bodies, and ignore the costs of heating and maintaining crematoria premises.


And when you consider the areas to be cleared in the cemeteries, it is worth remembering that some of the trees there were part of the initial cemetery planting (as trees were planted and are being planted in the areas now reclaimed and being re-used for burials) - it is likely that these trees - where they are in good condition - will be retained or replaced. So the claims that there are big trees amongst the 15 years old scrub growth is both true, and to some extent irrelevant.

Yes woodland burials would be the most environmental friendly but unfortunately that isn't being proposed for either area.


Probably because they are both (traditional) cemeteries. For people who wish traditional burials and memorials.

For those interested in the allegation that the dead of East Dulwich will poison East Dulwich drinking water.


Here are the references for the adjacent borehole reports.


If you read the reports you can see the groundwater depth.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...