Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nigee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you are aware a decent night out in London, is

> going to cost you probably a couple of hundred

> pound.


Nigee, may I recommend the Capitol at Forest Hill, spend two hundred quid in there in an evening and you get sent home with a couple of fruit machines and the barmaid/man of your choice.

Nigee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are really a crazy bunch, listen i have the

> money, that's not an issue.

> a million isn't that much these day's anyway, I

> can prove it,not that i should have to,

> If anyone can give me the name of a good agent

> that would probably be enough for me to be getting

> on with.

>

> This isn't a joke post i am 100% serious and have

> nothing to hide, so any serious suggestions are

> welomed.

>

>

> Thanks Nigee



Would you consider the wilds of Dorset as soon as I can part my ex wife from the old martial home I am in for 40% from the settlement?


Actually, I have just seen it is only ?1 million you have.


Sorry!

Nigee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yeah i just bet you have ????, in reply to Bob, i

> hope to be looking over the next few weeks.

> they don't have to million pound properties,

> that's just the maximum i would like to pay.

> Seem to have opened a can worms with my post!


And I bet they're silk worms.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Although Declan and Mick Mac would immediately

> fall under suspicion for laying tarmac that turns

> out to have the consistency of cookie dough just

> because they're bog Irish reprobates who'd most

> probably fleece an old lady of 5k for a cowboy

> effort.

>

> I'd rather insist that they spent a stint in the

> stocks. Not have the flesh flayed from their backs

> like what used to happen to micks in the good old

> days.



Thanks for that BBW...........now why don't u eff off back to Forest Hill and find your own forum?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...