Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I'm having a little nose on the se5 forum and came across this brilliant post - all about our forum! I think we should arm ourselves with our four wheel buggies, pop on our gucci sunglasses for disguise and get ready for our invasion...


http://www.se5forum.org/forum/index.php/topic,443.0.html

Ah yes .. Mr Dale. Very witty post it was too


If Hoopers had as many customers as that post had replies then they would be turning people away


Jamie & Viv spend a lot of time in SE22 pubs and we are merely returning the compliment. Plus as Piers has said - they are one of the few pubs in a 2 mile radius to do really good ales

That's great. Cheeky kitten, he bats for both sides...


I can't believe he's giving away our secrets re. the hotel discount.


Still, like all double agents once we know his role we can start feeding disinformation. In fact even the fact that we recognise this should taint the data he offers them... ;-) Ah subterfuge...

Fear not comrades. I have for 2 years now been informing people from places as far a field as Finchley to the North and Croydon to the South that Denmark Hill Station is in fact in East Dulwich. In fact my research tells me that the area was known as Dulwich Hill up until some time in the 18th century. Through my calculated campaign of subtle propaganda I intend to insinuate the idea into the national subconscious until it becomes so prevalent that the powers that be have little choice but to move the boundary line. It is my pleasure and duty to contribute to the cause. Victoire.

After the little sortie into Camberwell perhaps we could have a EDF drink in all the surrounding areas. Nice places in Forest Hill, we could try the Dulwich Wood House, we could head out west and end up in the Dog. Imperialist East Dulwich.


citizen

If we are to take on an expansionist attitude towards neighbouring areas may I suggest that our push into Peckham ends at Choumert Road, allowing us free access to Review and Ptitou without having to deal with the terrible stink that it Pekam Rye Station.;-)

I think its high time that ED had its own standing army and brought in a Lebensraum policy. A pre-emptive strike is really the only option open to us if we're to resist this type of e-bullying.


Meet tonight at the roundabout with your torches and pitchforks - we march on SE5 at midnight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...