Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I assume its private money because the logo is primarily a tool for making money and the olympics are only part funded by public money.


The olympic "brand" is heavily policed - that is, you can't just take advantage of the fact that you're a London business and start selling "lovely olympic pies", for example.


Everything that has a commercial potential around the olympics brand is controlled because it can be sold. Companies are licensed to use the logo in the same way companies are licensed to use Harry Potter or kids tv characters. Its a very big part of generating money to pay for the "thing" itself.

Having just sat through a LOCOG branding presentatiopn I can now see where they're going and I'm impressed, although I'm still not keen on the logo emblem. As someone said on the news last night it was a mistake to just release the emblem on it's own, not their full branding which has loads of potential and is actually quite exciting in it's possiblities.

I've held back on the whole logo debate as these things can often take time to sink in - and an astonishing bandwagon formed to condemn it which made me think it might be ok after all


Given the context (ie the logo design only - forget about the politics and debate about the wider Olympian ideals) I think it's alright. The fact that it has been so adaptable to so many who claim to despise it and can tailor it accordingly suggests that from a design perspective it's pretty neat


The other thing in it's favour is any comparison with other Olympic logos - most of them are pretty hideous. The Sydney one in particular is still poor after all this time


There was a 2 page pull out in the Guardian of all of the past logos which I can't find online but the official IOC page shows some horrors


The "original" London logo which everyone claims to prefer looks very.... bland and dull . IMO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't answer your question. But on them generally: it's changed hands in the last year or so, I think. I paid £35 for interior and exterior and they did a crap job. I'll go to the one on Herne Hill (or just do it myself if health allows) next time.
    • Aria came round to fix my tub drain when I'd messed up the seal. Came within hours, fixed the tub, and ran a bath to make sure it was okay. Here's where the fun starts. While he was over, I asked him questions about the rest of the plumbing round the house. I had just moved into a Victorian home that was previously being rented. Unsurprisingly, we found another leak in the tub and a drip in the kitchen tap.  He came back the next day to put a better pipe in my bathtub and replace the kitchen sink. Painstakingly figured out how to replace the hard-to-access kitchen sink without cutting through the wood panel with the help of his builder friend, Mark. Answered all my questions and clearly knew his stuff. All this right before Christmas holidays! 
    • Was that the one where you put a coin in and it squirted water at you? what was the name of the one in hanway street - whatever you ordered it came on a segmented tray like you get in prison (I imagine). Prices were a steal. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...