Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well done to The Ivy House - runner up for bar/pub of the year in SE15 (it won last year).


http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/results/peckham/bars-&-pubs


Haven't looked at it all, but some of the East Dulwich results are here - well done Franklins!


http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/results/dulwich-and-east-dulwich/restaurants


Delighted to see Blue Brick Cafe also a runner up!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/83383-time-out-results-are-out/
Share on other sites

Reg Smeeton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These look like worthy winners and nominees - I'm

> even prepared to believe this is an award based on

> merit rather than 'who paid us the most for a

> review'.



It was done by an online voting system.


I voted for the Ivy House, so I'm pretty sure it was genuine.


Doesn't necessarily mean "the best" won, though, just who got the most votes :)

And "Time Out" has bugger all advertising these days, so it's in their interests to let the readers tell them the trends that the magazine will now slavishly follow. And I learned today that the magazine's press day is Thursday. That's five days before it hits the streets, which is crap. An the online version is completely non-navigable. A pale shadow of its former self.

I thought you slated Franklins? In fact correct me if i am wrong but aren't you barred from Franklins! I don't think anybody will forget you slating them for their bubble and squeak and sending the chef a recipe.



Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well done to The Ivy House - runner up for bar/pub

> of the year in SE15 (it won last year).

>

> http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/re

> sults/peckham/bars-&-pubs

>

> Haven't looked at it all, but some of the East

> Dulwich results are here - well done Franklins!

>

> http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/re

> sults/dulwich-and-east-dulwich/restaurants

>

> Delighted to see Blue Brick Cafe also a runner up!

scotchbonnet1951 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought you slated Franklins? In fact correct me

> if i am wrong but aren't you barred from

> Franklins! I don't think anybody will forget you

> slating them for their bubble and squeak and

> sending the chef a recipe.

>

>

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well done to The Ivy House - runner up for

> bar/pub

> > of the year in SE15 (it won last year).

> >

> >

> http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/re

>

> > sults/peckham/bars-&-pubs

> >

> > Haven't looked at it all, but some of the East

> > Dulwich results are here - well done Franklins!

> >

> >

> http://www.timeout.com/london/lovelondonawards#/re

>

> > sults/dulwich-and-east-dulwich/restaurants

> >

> > Delighted to see Blue Brick Cafe also a runner

> up!



I don't know why you are bringing this up now.


No, I'm not barred from Franklins and never have been.


I have never slated their food in general, in fact I have praised it on many occasions as you could check if you could be bothered to look through my posts (just click on my name and they will all come up).


I was unhappy with one dish, the bubble and squeak, because after it had been absolutely fine every time I had it, on two occasions it came out as a pile of mash and cabbage which was completely soft and had not been crisped on the outside as bubble and squeak should be.


I had fed this back in person via the waitress, and when it happened again yes I did write to the chef and received no reply. Yes I did send a recipe, not for him to follow, but because that particular recipe clearly stated that the whole point of bubble and squeak was that it should be crisp on the outside.


When I received no reply I did not follow it up, and in fact subsequently checked out Franklins with a view to booking a space for a big family celebration, so clearly I was very happy with (most of) the food.


The reason I subsequently posted on the forum was because the manager (I think?) was extraordinarily rude to me when I went in with my partner for lunch. With no provocation whatsoever and with no prior warning, he verbally attacked me in front of a whole bar full of people as my partner and I were ordering lunch. The waitress who served us was extremely embarrassed and apologised for him, but he did not see fit to apologise himself.


It was that rudeness which was my complaint against Franklins, not the food.


Various people on the forum then chose to interpret my complaint about this specific incident of extreme rudeness as my disliking the food.


Again - you can look up the relevant thread and see for yourself.


But I have to ask you why you choose to bring this up so long after the event.


ETA: I did avoid Franklins for some time afterwards, because for obvious reasons I did not want to encounter this man again. However I have been back recently because I have not seen him in there and I hope he may be working elsewhere.


ETA: On clicking on your name, ScotchBonnet, I see you have made only twelve posts on this forum since 2012.


I have to ask, therefore, why you have such a particular interest in my having praised Franklins Time Out award that you chose to make your thirteenth post about it. And another one of your past twelve posts was having a personal go at me:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1584616,1595870#msg-1595870


This is what you said:


"Never happy are you Sue? Always having a pop at local businesses. Don't you get bored? But more to the point do you think ANYBODY on here actually listens to you constantly slating places."


I suggested you post links to all my posts where I am supposedly "always" and "constantly" slating places - but you didn't, did you?


Couldn't find any, could you? So I guess that's why you had to dredge up something from years ago on this thread.


Please either put up your evidence, or shut up. Thanks.


And your post is particularly ironic given that I started this thread actually praising local businesses :)) :)) :))

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FGS Sue - give it a rest and move on.


Why are you directing that to Sue? She wasn't the one banging on about bubble & squeak from YEARS ago until scotch bonnet singled her out for having the temerity to mention franklins. Absolutely no need for posts like that.


Seems like sue can't post anywhere on the forum without this particular poster gleefully taking the opportunity to make unpleasant and personal remarks towards her. Go look in the lounge. People who claim not to have time on their hands, often do. Funny that.

Yep, scotchbonnet1951 comes across as pretty childish and nasty, with a clear grudge against Sue, probably based on something Sue isn't aware of. And whilst Sue can be a bit of a dog with a bone about some things, she's done nothing at all wrong here so it's completely unfair for Celia to accuse her of dragging something up which someone else has dragged up.

scotchbonnet1951 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow I wish I had time on my hands like you!!!

> Blimey I bet Franklins are over the sodding moon

> that you are going back in there.

> Griefy Sue here she comes .... oh sorry didn't you

> know that was your nickname?


It would appear you have more time than most.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And right on cue, there is numbers to defend Sue.

> Given the infantile behaviour going on in the CGF

> thread I think it's a bit rich coming from

> numbers, and Sue is the last person who should be

> complaining about dragging things up.


Given the nature of the attack I would defend Sue too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction then pick up the 345 from Falcon Road ( exit Clapham Junction Station from the back entrance) The overground will terminate on platform one anyway so you're already on that side of the station. The 345 bit should take you approximately 30 minutes and the overground from Denmark Hill to CJ approximately 15 minutes. All the best!!
    • I would go to Victoria (185 bus or Southern Rail) then get either a bus from there to Chelsea Town hall (I think it may be the C1 but I'm not sure..I moved from that area over 25 years ago) and the Royal Marsden is a short walk from there. OR get a Underground from Victoria to Sloane square and a Taxi from there to Royal Marsden..It would'nt cost much because its a few mins away..or a bus from Sloane Square to Chelsea Town Hall or Fulham Rd/Sydney St 
    • I don't know how the law works, nor what rules cover what doctors can and can't say in their professional and private (?personal?) capacities,  but on the face of it I agree that some of the comments quoted are unacceptable, to say the least. However, in the context of the subject of this thread,  I think it is important to differentiate between antisemitism ("hostility to or prejudice against Jewish people") and hostility to  the Israeli government's apparent attempted genocide of Palestinian civilians in retribution for the appalling attack on Israeli civilians by Hamas. I might be completely wrong here, and naive, and I am sure someone will correct me if I am, but it seems to me to be as if the English government had started trying to annihilate the whole of the  Irish population because of the IRA bombings in the nineties. I also realise that there is a whole historic background to the Palestine/Israel thing, but I am not familiar with it. Anyway, I and everyone I know who has taken part in any of the recent marches has done so to try to get our government to stop supporting genocide, not because they are antisemitic. And yes there are other awful things going on in the world, and always have been. I can't fight all of them. One of my brothers has taken in three generations of  a Ukrainian family. ETA: Do you really think it is OK to refer to people as "blacks"? Or am I wrong about that as well, and there is some reason why it is acceptable?
    • An abridged version of the article I posted:    The health secretary is preparing to overhaul medical regulators — the General Medical Council (GMC) and Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) — after being appalled by a series of cases in which doctors have escaped disciplinary action. Streeting told The Times: “It is clear that the current medical regulatory system is completely failing to protect Jewish patients and NHS staff.”   Doctors have been let off after spreading antisemitic tropes including claiming that Britain is “controlled by Jewish supremacy”, and claiming the architect of the attack was a “legend”. Some medics have ramped up their activity in the days after the Manchester synagogue attack.   A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “Time and again, doctors who spew antisemitic bile online and in the streets are being allowed to continue practising medicine, as though calls for hatred and violence are compatible with the duty to care for others.”   Doctor who called Jews ‘worse than Nazis’ cleared Dr Rahmeh Aladwan was investigated over her social media posts, including one that stated that Israelis were “worse” than the Nazis and a claim that the “Royal Free Hospital in London is a Jewish supremacy cesspit”. Since escaping suspension by the MPTS, Aladwan has posted incessantly about Jews and Israel.   She suggested the media’s focus on the Manchester synagogue attack was an example of “Jewish supremacism”. The day after the attack Aladwan shared an image of Britain’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, with the words “rabbi genocide” emblazoned on his forehead. On Saturday, she tweeted: “Glory to the Palestinian armed resistance. Death to ‘Israel’.” Aladwan has been a member of the proscribed group Palestine Action, and has shared claims that Streeting is a “Zionist ghoul” funded by “the genocidal ‘Israel’ lobby”. At a rally earlier this year, she said that “Palestinian people who are fighting for liberation, including armed struggle” are “heroes, every single one of them”. “We are proud of our armed resistance and in Islam we call that jihad. That’s an honour. That’s how you defend your people,” she added.   The MPTS ruled that no suspension was necessary, arguing her comments would not “alarm or concern” members of the public.    On Monday night, the CAA announced that it had notified the GMC of its intent to challenge the decision not to impose the condition on Aladwan while she is under investigation. It said that her case was “one of the most egregious examples we have encountered of a regulator failing in its duty to protect the public”.   One of Aladwan’s key supporters is Dr Rehiana Ali, a consultant neurologist who was reinstated by a medical tribunal this year after describing the architect of the October 7 attacks as a “legend”, calling for Israel to be “dismantled”, and claiming that 9/11 was conducted by Mossad.   Ali has made several controversial comments in the wake of the Manchester synagogue terrorist attack, and has claimed that Streeting was an “Israeli puppet”. On October 4, she quoted a post calling for Israel to be abolished and claiming that Hamas had “done nothing to apologise for”, adding: “Agree 100%.” On October 2, about eight hours before the attack, she quoted the same post and said: “Armed resistance is the only solution.”   Ali defended her comments and told The Times that she did not believe in Israel’s right to exist. She said: “It is outrageous that the CAA weaponises an unfortunate incident to continue its defamatory attacks on doctors with a moral conscience for political ends.” Hundreds of complaints over antisemitic doctors Nearly 500 complaints of antisemitism relating to 123 doctors have been submitted to the GMC since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023. Of these, 84 per cent were closed at the triage stage, according to figures obtained by Jewish News in July. The rare cases where complaints have led to disciplinary action include that of Dr Manoj Sen, an NHS surgeon. Last month he was struck off for making a string of antisemitic social media comments, including referring to a Jewish man as “circumcised vermin”.   The doctor, who was working as a surgeon at Northwick Park Hospital in London, commented on a Facebook post shortly after the October 7 attacks, using the word “untermenschen” — German for subhuman — as well as the phrases “Jewish c***” and “Jew boy”. Sen also referred to the Auschwitz concentration camp along with the German phrase “Die Juden sind unsere Ungluck”, meaning “the Jews are our misfortune”.   Others have escaped serious sanctions after being reported for antisemitism. In February, Dr Kamran Ahmed, a Wolverhampton-based GP, was not struck off but given a formal warning after posting material described by the GMC as “objectively antisemitic and seriously offensive”. This included sharing a post which said: “The Israeli flag is modern-day swastika”. Dr Ellen Kriesels, a consultant paediatrician at Whittington Hospital, remains on the GMC register despite spending months making openly making racist claims. On her X account, Kriesels has claimed that “virtually every Jew has some feelings of supremacy”. The Whittington Health Trust has previously said that it was investigating and that Kriesels was not working.     Jewish doctors ‘are afraid at work’ Jewish doctors have warned that the institutional failures to tackle antisemitism extend to the British Medical Association (BMA). Those attending the BMA’s annual conference in June warned that they “feared for their safety”.    There have been widespread reports of antisemitic incidents in hospitals. In August, the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust issued an apology over posters claiming “Zionism is Poison”. A Jewish patient who was undergoing major tests at the hospital and felt “angry, distressed and upset” after seeing some of the posters, adding: “I shouldn’t have to remove my Star of David necklace to go to a hospital visit.” Concerns have been raised at at least two NHS trusts about staff wearing pro-Palestine symbols, such as lanyards in the design of a keffiyeh and badges that say “Free Palestine”. I don't have any skin in the game with what's happening in the Middle East (most likely like many on this forum) and I stand by my clearly stated opinion on other threads that neither Hamas, nor Israel, has clean hands.  What I do care about is what happens on British soil and the idea of any ethnic group in this country - with its supposed history of tolerance and inclusion - being afraid for their lives.  There can be little doubt that the rhetoric of many on these marches fuels the killing that we saw last week.  Don't share a platform with anti Semites.  If you care so much about a community being starved, abused, bombed and oppressed, why not march for Ukraine (where we do have skin in the game), or the 150,000 blacks murdered in Sudan as well? It makes no sense to me.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...