Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is really useful. I would think that the fact that there is a nursery school on the path would be a leverage point in the event of getting the bureaucratic version of "Ef off, we don't give a monkeys"


Imagine the outcry if another little old lady, mum-to-be - both with toddlers in tow were to be attacked. I think that whoever was in charge of releasing the funds to make it safer would be very uncomfortable if it were to come to light that they had refused.


That said, who do we make the first approach to? I'm none the wiser...

Acid, you make a very good point about the Nursery - there's also Bessemer Grange primary on that route, too. Plus its used by Charter and JAGs pupils.


I have put a request to James Barber, in the "ask the councillor" thread. Maybe there's someone at Southwark who we could email?

I have no option but to walk down Greendale since I collect my daughter from the Greendale nursery 3 times a week. I'm now really concerned about our safety! Apart from in recent weeks when I had been getting a little uneasy about how dark and quiet it can be in the evenings (this is my first winter using the pathway), I had been really happy to do this walk each day. If plenty of people are on the path (and it is really well used in the mornings) then I feel very safe. I'm keen to lend my support to any campaign for better lighting and anything else we can do to make this pathway safter. Also, can we not have some solidarity here - the more people using Greendale, the safer if will be!

This would seem like a prime candidate for the council's "Cleaner, Greener, Safer" funding scheme, however the scheme is operated at Community Council level and the majority of Greendale falls outside of the Dulwich Community Council area - see the red and black line on the attached map which marks the boundary. Once you're over the railway bridge it's Camberbell and suggestions to the CGS scheme are only allowed from people within the Community Council of the area affected. This is somewhat annoying as I suspect a lot of the users and potential users of Greendale are from the Dulwich Community Council area.

If anyone know of someone in the Camberwell area that would be willing to sponser an application then futher details of the application process can be found here.


file.php?5,file=7360

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...