Jump to content

Recommended Posts

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Camberwell badly needs a tube link.


There is no money for existing communities in the transport budget under Johnson. Unless public money can be used to line the pockets of property developers it aint being invested in infrastructure.

They were known as Mugways. If you want to use one there are some just down the road below the flyover.


Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I pass there last week have they got rid of the

> subways , were you have to go underground to get

> to the other side?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> healey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Camberwell badly needs a tube link.

>

> There is no money for existing communities in the

> transport budget under Johnson. Unless public

> money can be used to line the pockets of property

> developers it aint being invested in

> infrastructure.



..

Indeed, looks like it, but simply not good enough.


What makes it worse is that Walworth Rd seems to have lower priority at the lights than Kennington Park Rd which appears to carry far fewer bus routes.


rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> healey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Camberwell badly needs a tube link.

>

> There is no money for existing communities in the

> transport budget under Johnson. Unless public

> money can be used to line the pockets of property

> developers it aint being invested in

> infrastructure.

It makes me grumpy grumpy sweary sweary. And I have been through it on a bus, in a car and my daily commute by bike. It is illogical, the phasing is awful, the queue from the South from the New Kent Road is extended, the new right turn onto St George's Road means a long wait for the lights and then you almost come back on yourself, and then you get onto St George's Road and there is no traffic (ie it is all stuck before then). It has yet to make a jot of difference (compared to before the roadworks started) on my bike.


The bus lane means that traffic turning left coming from London Road has to cut left at the junction causing more chaos. It is chucking awful. Who the chuff designed it - have they any skills about traffic management. It beats the pointless traffic lights at the Forest Hill Road junction, and Dunstans, and Mostyn/Akerman Road (Brixton) hands down.


The only comparable traffic nonsense is the unecessary lights on the Lambeth Bridge Southside.

Judging from recent comments on this thread, it seems that it's much more congested coming through the Elephant from Walworth Road in the morning rush hour than from the West End in the evening. Is this correct, and if this is so, might this have something to do with the phasing of the lights with the result that traffic coming from Walworth Rd has lower priority than traffic coming from Kennington Park Rd?
Going from Walworth, towards London Bridge in the mornings - once you're through E&C, traffic is much better than it used to be as all the congestion is before E&C. Going south on same route in the evenings, it does block a long way back for cars - buses get all the way down in the bus lane and then merge into the car lane, thus moving faster than non-bus traffic.
My journey home via Blackfriars/E&C has also been much quicker in the last few days. I don't think it's the road layout so much as the fact there's less people and less traffic than normal. Not everyone seems to be back after the New Year yet (quite a few people away in our office until next week, for example).

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Better today. Perhaps the phasing is being

> tweaked....



And also maybe people are getting used to it?


I haven't driven round there yet, I'm dreading it because everybody will be hooting at me because I won't know where I should be going :(

today -11am, not peak time- had to drive daughter to Euston as she had so much luggage.


Approached elephant from New Kent Road, huge queue, then at the actual Elephant it seemed there was only one tiny lane curving round to the right, the other fork seemed to be cut off.


Then once across the Elephant and round the one way system to Blackfriars/Waterloo it was ridiculous. Not that much traffic but all of it made to wait for about twenty minutes to get through lights. You cannot take left to Waterloo until you have crossed the lights for traffic to Blackfriars, as it is all bus lane up till then. About three cars could go through green at a time. It seemed to be deliberately artificially manufacturing a traffic jam. Once through to Waterloo, hardly any traffic.


I kept thinking why? is it pleasant for hotel residents to have all that traffic snarled up under their windows, or local residents? Bus lane completely empty which explains my lightening bus journeys from the other direction of late. And cyclists using the one way system? Back to your expensively laid out cycle superhighway please!!

  • 4 weeks later...

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/elephant-and

> -castle-crash-air-ambulance-lands-at-roundabout-af

> ter-lorry-hits-elderly-woman-in-south-a3174026.htm

> l

>

> So much for safety improvements. No pedestrian

> ever got hit by a vehicle in an underground

> crossing.


I agree. They should make all vehicles in London drive underneath in tunnels so the rest of us can enjoy ourselves.

I am not excusing poor or dangerous driving but do want to point out that congestion and works make for impatience and - sometimes - bad habits. It's now pretty normal for buses and other large vehicles to speed up to get through an amber, rather than slowing down. Plenty of vehicles go through on red, thinking that it's OK because they are travelling at slow speeds. Pedestrians crossing willy nilly** - sometimes pushing buggies and carrying children - don't help either.

**I have no idea whether this applies to Friday's poor accident victim.

I work between the Elephant and Waterloo and my commute (originally usefully straightforward for someone with chronic health problems) has been getting more and more tortuous. It used to be one bus ride, but that began to take an impossibly long time; so I began getting the bus to Peckham, then train to Elephant and Castle, then walking the rest of the way. I still recall my sense of disbelief the day I found the pedestrian subways blocked with no alternative crossing except some temporary lights way off in the opposite direction to where I wanted to go, with roadworks & dust & cables all around and crowds building up as the lights remained unchanged for ages. It's astonishing that more people haven't been killed yet.


That Evening Standard article that Blah Blah posted a link to has some interesting comments under it. One comment asking why the pedestrian underpasses were removed before the crossings were complete - recipe for disaster. Another comment led me on to this site: http://saveoursubways.org which I wish I'd discovered earlier! It sums up the works with this succinct phrase: "...a misguided piazzafication of a major transport hub." Damn right.

Yes I read the comments and found them interesting too, especially the one that suggested the new layout was designed to attract investment over any kind of sensible traffic/pedestrian management.


Even cyclists had an easier time before because they could use assigned pathways crossing the roundabout. Now they are forced to go with the rest of the traffic, trying to cross lanes to get to the right filter lane, amongst more densely packed vehicles.


The fact still remains, that if pedestrians are forced to cross traffic, there will always be the risk of accidents. When pedestrians can avoid traffic altogether, there are no accidents. The same is true for cyclists. How the designer of this new layout thought either of those two groups of users would be safer is mystifying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes,I presumed so , but having been unable to find one ,I thought I'd ask on here.   It may be because I need to.virw the map on something other than my phone .
    • Sorry to hear that, New Wave. I hope you find something soon. I genuinely had this situation in Superdrug on the south coast yesterday. I was buying their own version of E45 cream (it's about a third of the cost) and they asked if I had my Superdrug card with me. I didn't. Who does?  But they were able to apply the appropriate discount to my purchase due to them having my mobile phone number and email on record.  You can fill in any old bollocks for the loyalty card. I found it quite funny when they asked me to confirm that I was Dr. Dave Dave, of Dave Road, Dave, London, SE15 5DV. I'm actually not a real doctor!  
    • With gym memberships, it depends how often you go and how much you get out of it. If you go 3 times a week or lose 10kg in a year, that's a bargain. If you never go, it's incredibly expensive. There are people who will happily spend £50 2-3 times a week at the pub or on takeaway food or coffees over the course of a week or leasing a car. Whether it's worth it is up to you. 🤷‍♂️
    • Also, if you keep receipts but don't have a card, they will give you the discounts you would have had. Probably a good idea to take the receipts in at a quiet time, though 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...