Jump to content

Star Wars

siousxiesue

By siousxiesue
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

miga

miga

Posted
Posted
I studied something very geeky at university. I work in a geeky job. I first saw the original ones about 15 years ago, once I'd already started work, because I felt obliged to as it's such a cannonical part of "geek culture" and referenced so much. My take on it is that if you were an adolescent at a particular time (when they came out + ~10 years), and had not been exposed to sci fi, or much film or literature in general when you saw it, you're likely to think it's the best thing since sliced bread. For the rest of us, they're fun flicks, but not the high point of sci fi people make them out to be. I'm fully aware this is practically blasphemy in certain circles.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936667
Share on other sites
Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

I was born in 78, so grew up with the original films, and loved them (I wanted a light sabre so desperately. A real one, not a stupid toy). But despite that I was never mad on it, and when the second lot of films (prequels) were released I didn't go running to the cinema. And I am pleased I didn't because they were utter shite.


I'll watch the new one when it's available for home viewing, because it will be cool to see the characters from my childhood, and I think Disney will probably have made an entertaining film now they're in charge. But again, I won't be running to the cinema, and I'm not one of these people pouring over every second of every trailer to be released.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936685
Share on other sites
numbers

numbers

Posted
Posted

siousxiesue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person never to have seen ANY of

> these movies? Not sure how they completely passed

> me by.. (and should I?)


This thread reminds me there is/was a radio programme by the irritating as fuck marcus brigstock called I've Never Seen Star Wars. Well, I've never seen ET (if I do, the world will end).


Love Star Wars but only because I grew up with it too and remember my brother had the original figurines which my mum gave away to charity!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936716
Share on other sites
????

????

Posted
Posted

I think the age think is important - I was 15 when Star Wars was released and far more interested in the Sex Pistols and Tracy ******** in 4.3. It was OK. I also remember that it caused clunk of pretty poor disco records too - " Ilost my Heart to a Starship Trooper" - Sarah Brightman.... terrible ; "Can you Feel the Force" - The Real Thing..not sooo bad


I suspect most avid fans are below 50

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936906
Share on other sites
Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

My wife hasn't seen any of them - she's not really interested in that genre of film.


I think peoples love of the originals is largely a nostalgia thing.. the first one in particular was groundbreaking. But in all honestly the script/plot is not amazing, and some of the acting is bad.


What I don't get is how Star Wars toys are huge this Christmas, and the new movie isn't even out yet!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936970
Share on other sites
Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But in all honestly the

> script/plot is not amazing, and some of the acting

> is bad.




Yep, I watched the second half of Return of the Jedi on telly a little while ago. First time I'd seen any of them in years, and it was shocking how back some of the acting was.


Probably explains why Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher haven't exactly had great careers since.


 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86372-star-wars/#findComment-936974
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • marsie
      Stop mega-nursery creating further traffic misery on East Dulwich Grove

      By marsie · Posted

      Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • malumbu
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By malumbu · Posted

      @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Insuflo
      Will Mandelson be accepted across the pond.

      By Insuflo · Posted

      Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...