Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bus no, Tube yes...stooping into my space


------------------------------------------


Oh now "tallism" what next, big feet ?


Oh I can see it now, the foot license


"Excuse me Sir this license is for a size 7 & you are quite clearly wearing a size 9 "


I'm going to be the annoying one and say this thread is probably really upsetting some people. Sorry!



I was trying to point it out with my ugly people in the hairdressers comment. This thread is a bit off IMO. Yes I know people can lose weight, but still, the first thing that popped in to my head, was certain seats for black people on buses in some places in the past.


I know it was started in a light hearted manner, but not a nice thread.


Besides, if the fat people paid double, they'd still take up the same space, so you'd still be sat next to them, the money wouldn't change that.

Has the EDF taken a big step to the right or are the Guardian/Indie readers all at work? This thread has moved me to log in for the first time in about a year. Have to say I find body fascism worrying. I know the tabloids love to fill their empty columns with it but this forum used to be relatively inclusive.

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey I can see why it wasn't successful! Wide

> seats for everyone (ie, benches) - thats the only

> way...


______________________________________________________


Oh no, then the "Idle" would only lie down on them.


Note* Please don't take this as mocking the "Idle" I mean they might have "Idleitus" and that's not nice.



W**F


* Stuffs another M&S choclate biscuit into mouth*

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has the EDF taken a big step to the right or are

> the Guardian/Indie readers all at work? This

> thread has moved me to log in for the first time

> in about a year. Have to say I find body fascism

> worrying. I know the tabloids love to fill their

> empty columns with it but this forum used to be

> relatively inclusive.



Good point well made. Also agree with Sophie & Keef. Time to bow out.

..and who said Guardian readers hadn't got a sense of humour? Come on.... I've never seen a more tongue in cheek set of posts poking fun at such stupidty as charging fat people all through this thread. Fight battles that are worth fighting FFS not ones that don't exist.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ????, try substituting the word 'black' or 'gay'

> for 'fat' or 'ugly'. Still think it's OK?



It's not the same at all. Try reading posts that aren't poking fun at an easy target but pointing out the stupidity of prejudice - jeez, read them and look up satire too...I give in if people can't see that.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ????, try substituting the word 'black' or 'gay'

> for 'fat' or 'ugly'. Still think it's OK?


_______________________________________________________________


You missed out "disabled" there & isn't "ugly" subjective anyway ?



W**F

Giggirl - I agree with you about small children having to sit on a parent's lap or sharing with another small child. I asked one man to let his kid sit on his lap on a crowded bus, and he acted as if I had asked him to wipe my arse. I explained that she was little and she hadn't paid and that I had a ticket and was tired after an 11 hour shift. He still couldn't quite see why I felt it was the right thing for his daughter to do but relented - grudgingly - in the end. Now, if it had been a fat kid....

My point is that there has been a lot of discussion and education around racism and homophobia and so most people now know it's not acceptable to discriminate, criticise or mock on those grounds, but some people seem to find it difficult to work out what amounts to discrimination in other areas.


For what it's worth, you could argue that 'fat' - or for that matter 'black', 'gay' or 'disabled' are subjective terms.


Not sure any of these posts could be called satire, by the way...

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Giggirl - I agree with you about small children

> having to sit on a parent's lap or sharing with

> another small child. I asked one man to let his

> kid sit on his lap on a crowded bus, and he acted

> as if I had asked him to wipe my arse. I explained

> that she was little and she hadn't paid and that I

> had a ticket and was tired after an 11 hour shift.

> He still couldn't quite see why I felt it was the

> right thing for his daughter to do but relented -

> grudgingly - in the end. Now, if it had been a fat

> kid....


so were you more important than the child because of their age? because they were little? or because of the fact that you splashed your hard cash?


if i'm older/bigger/richer than you, can i ask you to give up your seat for me?


i'd have told you to stick it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Reeves should be next.telling porkies about her work record. And also Ed milliband for killing that poor bacon sarnie    
    • Sorry @malumbu do your own investigation into that  I'm old enough to remember things like the mass unemployment in the late 70s (down to labour) along with inflation running high, 4 day weeks and so on. So its not just about sleaze but wrecking the economy.   
    • Ok list Labour Vs Tory sleaze.  I expect Tories will win (ie more scandals). Not good as a politician but as a nation most of us are greedy, Thatcher exploited that, and anyone who avoids tax is a thief by your broad definition. I'll be the first to hand myself in having occasionally paid cash in hand for jobs   i expect as a teenager doing casual work in the summer mist of the adults were signing on
    • I think the problem is Labour  are reminding everyone of the awful Tory behaviour by behaving in exactly the same way - they promised they would be different but have been anything but and yes all this is doing is playing into the hands of Farage. Rayner has created a massive mess for Starmer and the party and I think his reshuffle is not necessarily for the benefit of the country but his political longevity - the real infighting within Labour is about to start now Rayner has gone. For everyone's sake (whether you support them or not) Labour have got to get a grip - it's been one disaster after another and I cannot help but think that things are going to get really difficult for them around the budget as there is going to be a lot of very disgruntled "working people" out there. Farage is just sitting there on the sidelines watching Labour fall apart and rubbing his hands with glee...very, very scary.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...