Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks all, there is some really useful info here.


Millie42, your correct, it hasn't been tested on pregnant women!! I too am extremely dubious, when pregnant you can take barely any drugs yet a brand new vaccine is being encouraged!?!? Its good to hear from someone who had it, thought it was awful yet still wouldnt take the drugs!!


I know a few people that have had it, sympoms seem to vary in severity and people close to them ie living with them and even sharing a bed with them have not caught it!


From what I have read swine flu is not particularly contagious and although unpleasant to have, in the vast majority of people isn't at all serious. It even seems that pregnant women are no more likely to get it than others despite the supressed immunity.


The issue all surrounds people with other underlying health issues, preganancy being one! If you do catch it your more likely to be in the very small percentage of people who it has a serious effect on.


The NHS is not cash rich and has to make decisions on all sorts of drugs and their use. I think at the moment there is genuinely a short supply of the vaccine, hence those most at risk are being targeted. Once more of the vaccine is available I am sure it will be just like the seasonal flu jab, ie certain people get on the NHS others (deemed low risk) can pay if they want it, but it isnt included in public health care as the costs outweigh the benefits. I do agree with this approach, the NHS is after all public health care for those that need it. It is never going to be able to offer everyone everything they want regardless of cost or actual risk.


It really does boil down to being a personal choice based upon the facts available. Given my personal circumstances and the information available, despite being pregnant and asthmatic I for one am not going to have the vaccine - happy to auction the vaccine with my name on to the highest bidder though ;-) (that is a joke btw!!)


Thanks everyone, some really useful info and links here :-)

Positively dangerous, a copy of an honest disclaimer from the website vactruth



Disclaimer


DISCLAIMER:

The information contained within the VACTRUTH website is for educational and informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as medical advice.? If you have a medical problem, you need the help of a trained medical professional.


These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. VACTRUTH has endeavored to provide accurate and credible information. However, errors can occur. Therefore, readers are urged to verify all of the data on this website.


VACTRUTH is not endorsed by pharmaceutical companies, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the FDA, CDC or any other federal, state or ?official? organization. For official information about vaccines, contact vaccine manufacturers, the FDA, CDC or World Health Organization.


By using the information presented on this website, you agree to take FULL responsibility for yourself. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take responsibility for your own actions. You have the right to be healthy! I encourage you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research (or in partnership with a qualified health care professional ? talk to your physician, chiropractor, and pharmacist).


No one associated with this website recommends for or against vaccines. If you have questions regarding any of the information on this website, research immunizations to a greater degree so that you can make wise and informed decisions.


If you suspect you have a disease or health related condition of any kind, please learn and research! Learn from more then one source! If you are unable to learn, or if you are unable to help yourself, you should contact qualified health care professional practicing natural and holistic therapies immediately. The results reported on this website may NOT occur in all individuals.

Share and Enjoy:


* Print

* Digg

* del.icio.us

* Facebook

* StumbleUpon

* Twitter

* Yahoo! Buzz

* PDF

If you go to the home page of Vactruth, the lead article is written by someone called Dr (sic) Gary Null. If you Google the chap, you will find a piece on him by the estimable "Quackwatch (see here - http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html).


It is in my view dangerous to cite views peddled by someone like this. It adds nothing to the debate to suggest that junk science of this nature in anyway informs or should inform individual decisions.

I found the following two links from New Scientist useful when weighing up the pros and cons (as well as addressing various myths). There's a lot of heresay and opinon about with respect to swine-flu and the H1N1 vaccine, I wanted my decision to be evidence-based. Hope these help.



http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18014-swine-flu-myth-the-vaccine-isnt-safe--it-has-been-rushed-through-tests-and-the-last-time-there-was-a-swine-flu-scare-the-vaccine-hurt-people-why-take-the-risk-to-prevent-mild-flu.html


http://www.newscientist.com/special/swine-flu-myths-that-could-endanger-your-life


Agathoise

Really good info., especially the "8 myths" piece.


But now I'm more frustrated about not having access to the vaccine. This should NOT be about economics....... some of us (including those in newscientist) really do believe the threat potential of a serious pandemic, and when I think about places like London, sooooo many people crammed into such an impossibly tight space....... maybe I've seen one too many of those hypothetical documentaries on how fast such a thing can move through London. Okay so it was probably anthrax :), but still! This is not a place one can avoid highly transmittable diseases!

antijen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://vactruth.com/2009/09/11/ingredients-found-i

> n-spermicides-cleaners-and-cosmetics-along-with-th

> imerosal-and-squalene-present-in-experimental-h1n1

> -vaccine/

>

> I think before deciding people should do a

> thorough check, I am also offered flu vaccines

> each year, and there are many reasons why I

> refuse, for me it is a question of being

> responsible for my own health rather than put

> faith in a system I absolutely do not trust.


More rubbish im afraid


Please treat this link with the contempt it deserves

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...