Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Could be one for the lounge this - it's definitely ED related but is whimsical too - let's start and see what happens


If ED and it's environs were somewhere else what would the different areas be called?


As an example the area at the top of LL near the library has been called the Upper East Side - a NY reference which probably makes:


North Cross RD = Greenwich Village

Peckham Rye = Battery Park.

Dulwich Village = The Hamptons


Anyone else have any NY references and then we could move on to another city.


If there are any artists out there perhaps they could sketch these up as they develop and they might end up being worthwile local artwork?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/870-alternative-dulwich/
Share on other sites

I like the buildings being named as well - some more dubious than other tho'


Some great suggestions on here but preferably we should have some kind of geographical relationshiop. Bermondsey might be the Bronx to some people but that's isn't going to work on a map.

(Besides I walk through it every day and it's not bad at all. I saw Tobet Maguire looking at some apartments there yesterday as well)

eccentric


funnily enough I have never had reason to hang a left when I reach that crossroads - I am curious by nature but you are hinting I would be wise not to?


Anyway - back on topic - do we have any volunteers to sketch this out - I think it could be a seller (along with the ED postcards)

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bermondsey has a reputation worse than its bite

> IMO. Rotherhithe is rather sulubrious, I lived

> there before moving to East Dulwich and we had

> lots of well known faces moving into the area.



Indeed Tillie, I lived on Rotherhithe St (Downtown area)for 4 years prior to moving into ED in 1981. I think the part of Bermondsey I was referring to was the Abbey Road Grange Road St James Road triangle, not at all salubrious!


BTW, when you mentioned, ?faces? did you mean faces in the south London gangster idiom?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Nope. I don’t have this wrong. I’ve tried to put my point across respectfully, and explain that I understand the nuance of editing, story-telling and reporting better than many, without resorting to personal, angry insults. And all my colleagues agree that the BBC got this right in its condemnation.    All you see is confirmation bias.    If you don’t realise that, then you’re part of the problem.    
    • We have always gone during the week at lunch time - great place and good value. Husband has been several times on his own and owner knows his first name. I could not go one time for some reason and she sent him home with some spring rolls (free)
    • We did but they would not budge.   Anyway this was last year - things may have changed and staff may be different. It was a man who served us.
    • Because some people have weird fake beliefs and when people point out just how fake by pointing at actual events the fake people get all huffy and say “this is why “ make your argument instead of repeating  nonsense - why am I wrong? Because what you have said doesn’t make that argument  or admit you might have this wrong  Which words on my last post are false or make you not post? What is the problem ? Someone posts: “You don't know what you're talking about, Sephiroth,” and I reply with that happened.  And this same person the responds with “this is why people don’t post on the forum anymore !” like - they were rude  to and dismissive of me, right?  But I’m the bad guy? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...