Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>> Gentlemen

> Do you shake, wipe or waggle ?

> If there are three urinals, and no one there,

> which would you use ?

> If there is someone in the middle, would you use

> the one either side ?

> Do you prefer not to pee in public ?


The difference between shaking and waggling being?

The one on the right, obviously.

The one on the right, obviously. But I'd give him one of my looks.

By 'in public', do you mean al fresco?

JoJo09 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *shudders at the memory of primary school

> greaseproof paper-style toilet experiences*

>

> It didn't ABSORB! Just moved it around!


___________________________________________________


It was called IZAL & when rested over a plastic comb it made a great musical instrument ( well, like a cheap Kazoo) if you hummed through tight lips



Oh please don't go there, you know lips & tight la la



W**F

Oh and W H Auden liked to p122 into his kitchen sink


The original draught of his famous poem went as follows


Stop all the clocks, get out your co*ks, cut off the telephone, Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone, Silence the pianos and with muffled drum , tighten your bum, on tip toes release the flow, into the kitchen sink I go....


But his publisher "Armitage Shanks" would have none of it, they told Auden "it's crap, what business do you think we are in ?"


And the rest is history of course, with Auden disappearing into complete obscurity, while "Shanks" dominate to this day



W**F

That's a very good question.


Urinal technology being what it is, I think you'd have to jet piss at an optimium angle and velocity to achieve anything above the usual (and unavoidable) level of piss splash - in which case it's not something that you'd do 'by accident'.


So if somebody is splashing piss around on purpose or, say, wiping their bum on the mirror, you might have to say something. Or at least move a little further away and try not to catch their eye.

I'd say about 90% of it is probably your own. Let me explain.


If you don't get your bell-end close enough to the urinal wall, it's possible you could cascade a waterfall of piss straight down to the bottom, causing a major piss droplet splash and a most unseemly din.


However, in leaning the old chap in to avoid said guttering of piss, you fall foul of the fine misting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...