Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guinness, JD, a good Islay malt whisky, Mount Gay

> rum, Red Stripe lager and a case of Chateaux

> Margaux.


You're not fussy either I see. Although you did once leave the 10 year old Appleton rum I poured for you.


(You forgot Woodfordes reserve)

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Guinness, JD, a good Islay malt whisky, Mount

> Gay

> > rum, Red Stripe lager and a case of Chateaux

> > Margaux.

>

> You're not fussy either I see. Although you did

> once leave the 10 year old Appleton rum I poured

> for you.

>

> (You forgot Woodfordes reserve)


Left a ten-year-old Appletons? I find that hard to believe.


How on earth could I have forgotten the Woodford's Reserve? Good grief! It's finest bourbon known to humanity. Thank god you reminded me.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guinness, JD, a good Islay malt whisky, Red Stripe lager and a case of Chateaux

> Margaux.


I'm along the same lines - with Strathisla being my current favourite malt (but any damn whisky will do if I'm stuck).


Have never experienced Chateau Margaux and I'm afraid it is never likely to happen.


I'd replace rum with brandy, on Jah's list, for after dinner purposes, of course.

Stella, Adnams Broadside, cold Muscadet, Prosecco, gin, tonic, ice, lemon, that red stuff whose name I can't remember but which turns gin pink, dry cider, BAILEYS if it's Christmas or something else sweet and sickly, yeh malt whisky :))


Dark rum if hot chocolate is also available :))


Oh and maybe calvados ....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...