Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you are not a cyclist would you want one of these parked right outside your front door.


Will they be sited away from residential front doors?


I would not like one right outside my house.

----


In answer to your question (1) yes I'm a cyclist (2) no I certainly wouldn't want to look out of my window onto that.

----


Except the having it in front of your house doesn't guarantee you access to it. Personally, I wouldn't want one directly in front of my house. I'm glad there are people who do though as hopefully the council will take individual preference into consideration when selecting the precise location.



----

Just a handful of the examples of NIMBYism on this thread.

I never asked those questions by the way, that was someone else.


I don't think the hangers should be located in front of front doors but at junctions away from front doors. If other people want them in front of their front doors then great for them. I'm glad siting them is done via consultation so that people can get what they want / makes sense for them.


If that is NIMBYism to you so be it, you clearly are just spoiling for a fight

"Yes, DF, that is why I asked DaveR if he thought those/any family who requested a hangar on their street should also give up their car, if they have one. He did not answer."


Just to be clear, I didn't answer because it's a very stupid question.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> I don't think the hangers should be located in

> front of front doors but at junctions away from

> front doors. If other people want them in front

> of their front doors then great for them. I'm glad

> siting them is done via consultation so that

> people can get what they want / makes sense for

> them.

>



Consultation not according to this


We're trying to get them placed outside people who have requested them.

Lambeth now has over 150 of these installed. Southwark is aiming for another 89 to add to 11. With the right scale this could become a strategic transport project and that is the angle I've taken with council officials.


With regard to attractiveness. Lambeth in some cases have bookened them with street streets in the road. Seems a great way of doing it.


--------------------

Regards [email protected]

07900 227366

Liberal Democrat Councillor for East Dulwich Ward

Skype cllrjamesbarber

[www.jamesbarber.org.uk]

[twitter.c

Here's one of those hangars looking a lot less fugly..


http://winerides.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Bikehangar-Planters-Wood.jpg


@ keano77 they're basically just bolted down - and if nobody's using it, I'd imagine the council will move it to somewhere that it will get used. So that they can charge people to use it. No point in having them on the street if they're not used.

Most streets do not have a front door at the junction. Most streets have two junctions. Its entirely possible to do this for virtually every road that requests it without running out of space.


rupert jones Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are only so many junctions with space to use

> safely, most of ED have houses on the end of

> roads.

wulfhound Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's one of those hangars looking a lot less

> fugly..

>

> http://winerides.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/

> Bikehangar-Planters-Wood.jpg

>

> @ keano77 they're basically just bolted down - and

> if nobody's using it, I'd imagine the council will

> move it to somewhere that it will get used. So

> that they can charge people to use it. No point in

> having them on the street if they're not used.


Yes, fair enough wulfhound, that would make sense.


However, I can't help feeling the hangars look like pig pens

rupert jones Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I must be walking round another Ed.

>

> E.g where would you put them on Shawbury Road,

> sylvester Road, Melbourne Grove. East Dulwich

> Grove etc


Literally spend 30 seconds on Google Street View and you'll find that all of these streets have stretches which are not directly overlooked by houses. For example:


Shawbury Rd:



Sylvester Road:



Melbourne Grove:



But really, one could equally complain about having to overlook cars/ vans etc. The only difference is that we're used to the latter and these hangers are new.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rupert jones Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I must be walking round another Ed.

> >

> > E.g where would you put them on Shawbury Road,

> > sylvester Road, Melbourne Grove. East Dulwich

> > Grove etc

>

> Literally spend 30 seconds on Google Street View

> and you'll find that all of these streets have

> stretches which are not directly overlooked by

> houses. For example:

>

> Shawbury Rd:

>


> 86,3a,75y,31.83h,69.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szXbZyG

> YmQSaY7eEasQVw7w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

>

> Sylvester Road:

>


> 26,3a,75y,345.96h,54.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVfRku

> u-mahr1YZRgFbl4NQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

>

> Melbourne Grove:

>


> 68,3a,75y,307.64h,71.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svtiIg

> gSDLqs2hZ-2krHXoA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

>

> But really, one could equally complain about

> having to overlook cars/ vans etc. The only

> difference is that we're used to the latter and

> these hangers are new.



These all look like great positions for bike Hangars.

richard tudor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think what Rupert was saying the above are only

> example names he had come to mind and not all the

> roads in East Dulwich.


Almost every street has similar spots, which aren't directly overlooked, that's the point. take almost any street and a quick Streetview will uncover a bits which aren't located directly outside someone's front door.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can suggest a location using the website

> here:

>

> https://www.cyclehoop.rentals/suggest-location/

>

> Interestingly there is also a map of all the

> locations that have already been suggested.


Will Southwark be subjecting all these bikehangers to local consultation or will they just plonk them down and thats it?




>

>

Exactly, that was my point. I don't think this is a big deal. They have been and can be located in this way. If some people specifically prefer to have them directly in front of their house as they think that's better, then hopefully that could also be arranged at the time of request.


I like the planters in the picture some else attached. It definitely softens the look of them.


The hangars come what may are a great new addition.


rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> richard tudor Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think what Rupert was saying the above are

> only

> > example names he had come to mind and not all

> the

> > roads in East Dulwich.

>

> Almost every street has similar spots, which

> aren't directly overlooked, that's the point. take

> almost any street and a quick Streetview will

> uncover a bits which aren't located directly

> outside someone's front door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...