Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My dear chap when I first started working in what was then termed "Fleet Street" many moons ago (probably before you were born, you young skallywag) if you didn't have a bottle of whisky on your desk by 11.30am you were considered a bit of a girlie.


Take a tip from an old lush and secrete a bottle of what you fancy in your draw for moments like these and top up your coffee with a shot or two. That'll ease the boredom of a quite Friday that drags and set you up for a Friday evening's carousing when it's time to leave.


A nod's as good as a wink to a blind horse.

Oh! If you insist Ted.


Towards the end of the morning and waiting impatiently for the pubs to open one would reach for the sanctuary of a bottle of Ding Dong to satiate one's thirst before heading off to The Stab In The Back for a pint or seven at lunchtime.


It's a wonder really how we ever got any work done.

To join Jah in the old boy's alcoholic reminiscing, when I started work in publishing in the mid-80s we went to the pub everyday. To not go was considered not joining in with the workplace and was generally frowned upon. My office canteen had a bar and any director had a drinks cabinet with spirits/red wine for meetings. Monday was about the only day you could get away with not going to the pub. Plus everyone drank alcohol, no 'lime and soda' crap, and Fridays especially were a write off after lunch (although 'cos the pubs then shut at 3pm then, the afternoon involved drinking spirits or wine out of tea cups). Scarily alot of people were driving in or driving from the station when they got home. In addition everyone smoked anywhere so the office was full of smoke. I think this was pretty normal for most 'service' jobs then, certainly my mates who worked in advertising, finance, research etc all had similar routines. I think the early 90s recession was when it started to change. Now, on the rare occasions you get anyone at work to go down the pub at lunch anyone under 30 drinks soft drinks.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds great, but I was alluding to one of my

> favourite books, by Michael Frayn. Are we on the

> same wavelength here?


Obviously that one flew over my head. Just looked the book up and it would seem it's right up my Fleet Street and so shall be investing in a copy as soon as.

I'm sure Jah resorted to the bottle waiting for the go ahead to do some work as he was waiting on the people I worked for in those days to supply the pressrooms with paper.....the Scandanavians!Plush surroundings in Mayfair. A Swedish sauna in the office for staff use. And plenty of pubs frequented by everyone..........for long periods.


My particular memory of the market in Mayfair wasn't the fact that there was a house of ill repute there, but the day a what looked like an expensive car came to halt beside me and a youngish lady rolled down her window and asked me did I want a f**k! Those were the days!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...